Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
Award No. 13150
Docket No. 13011
97-2-95-2-31

The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Elizabeth C. Wesman when award was rendered.

(International Association of Machinists and ( Aerospace Workers PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (Consolidated Rail Corporation

STATEMENT OF CLAIM:



FINDINGS:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.


Form 1 Award No. 13150
Page 2 Docket No. 13011
97-2-95-2-31

Until his dismissal Claimant was assigned as a Machinist in the Maintenance Department of Carrier's Enola Diesel Terminal. On March 11, 1994, Carrier informed Claimant that he was removed from service and confirmed that fact in a letter dated March 14, 1994. On March 16, 1994, Claimant was instructed to appear for a trial in connection with the following charges:
































Form 1 Award No. 13150
Page 3 Docket No. 13011
97-2-95-2-31
without verbal and/or written permission from your
supervisor or any other person in authority.

































Form 1 Award No. 13150
Page 4 Docket No. 13011
97-2-95-2-31
maintenance area with the fork lift truck and stored them at
the Enola Diesel Terminal, Enola, PA, without verbal and/or
written permission from your supervisor or any other person
in authority. Later that night they were missing from the
maintenance area.





























Form 1 Award No. 13150
Page 5 Docket No. 13011
97-2-95-2-31



At the outset, the Organization has raised procedural and due process objections to the investigation concerning the incident at issue. After a careful review of the record before the Board we do not find any basis of support for the Organization's contentions.


With respect to the merits of the case, Claimant admitted to removing fuel from Carrier's property and converting it to his private use. Accordingly, the Board finds that the Carrier has met its burden of persuasion with respect to all the charges.








This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.



                        Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of September 1997.