Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
Award No. 13159
Docket No. 13054
97-2-95-2-77

The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Elizabeth C. Wesman when award was rendered.

(International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers ( System Council No. 16 PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (Burlington Northern Railroad

STATEMENT OF CLAIM:











FINDINGS:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.
Form 1 Award No. 13159
Page 2 Docket No. 13054
97-2-95-2-77

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




At the outset, the Organization has alleged that the Investigatory Hearing was held in an unfair and biased manner. A careful review of the transcript of that Hearing fails to support the Organization's contention.


It is undisputed that Claimant was not wearing eye or ear protective gear when he was observed on or about 2:10 P.M. on February 24, 1994. Claimant's explanation was that the gear was in his truck and his truck had been removed from the property by his Foreman. Not only does his "reasoning" not excuse his failure to wear the required equipment, but there is also unrefuted testimony on the record that there were duplicate eye and ear protectors available to him in a nearby building. Under the circumstances the discipline assessed was neither excessive nor arbitrary.








This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.



                      By Order of Second Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of September 1997.