Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
Award No. 13247
Docket No. 13185-T
98-2-96-2-88
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee
Eckehard Muessig when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen, Division of
( Transportation Communications International Union
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Chesapeake and
( Ohio Railway Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Claim of the Committee of the Union that:
1. That the Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad Company (CSX
Transportation, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as `carrier') violated
the controlling Shop Crafts Agreement specifically Rule 154 (a) and
(b), when the carrier assigned other than carmen painters to
perform work exclusively reserved to the carmen painters craft.
2. Accordingly, the carrier be instructed to pay carman W. E. Love,
Jr., ID #188769 (Hereinafter referred to as `claimant') eight hours
at the applicable carman overtime rate for said violation."
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor,1ct, as
approved June 21, 1934.
Form 1 Award No. 13247
Page 2 Docket No. 13185-T
98-2-96-2-88
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved
herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
As Third Party in Interest, the International Association of Machinists and
Aerospace Workers was advised of the pendency of this dispute, but it chose not to file
a Submission with the Board.
This is another case whose focus is primarily upon Classification of Work Rule
154 and the Carrier's application of the Incidental Work Rule. By reference here, the
Board incorporates its discussion of Article V of the Incidental Work Rule in Second
Division Award 13244.
This claim arose because the Carrier assigned a Machinist to paint three lockers
in the Truck Shop at its Huntington Locomotive Shop. The Carrier asserts that the
actual painting took two hours or less and was a "simple task" as contemplated by the
Incidental Work Rule.
The Organization contends that the disputed work properly belongs to its craft
pursuant to Rule 154 and that Carmen Painters have historically painted lockers at the
Huntington Locomotive Shop.
The Board finds that the disputed work is properly that of the Carmen Painter
craft. Nonetheless, we do not find sufficient evidence to establish the actual time that it
took to paint the three lockers. Because there is an irreconcilable conflict in the record
established on the property as to this key data, we must dismiss the claim.
AWARD
Claim dismissed.
Form 1 Award No.
13247
Page
3
Docket No.
13185-T
98-2-96-2-88
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that
an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of March
1998.