Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
Award No. 13533
Docket No. 13445
00-2-99-2-42
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee
Robert L. Hicks when award was rendered.
(International Association of Machinists and
( Aerospace Workers
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Kansas City Southern Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"That the Kansas City Southern Railway Company (hereinafter referred
to as the "Carrier") violated Rule 8 of the Controlling Agreement,
effective April 1, 1980, as amended, between the Kansas City Southern
Railway Company and its Employees represented by the International
Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (hereinafter referred
to as the "Organization") when it wrongfully bypassed P. E. Orender
(hereinafter referred to as the "Claimant") for eight hours of overtime
March 9, 1998.
Accordingly, we request that for this violation, the Claimant be
compensated for the eight hours pay at one and one-half his pro rata rate
of pay."
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved
herein.
Form 1 Award No. 13533
Page 2 Docket No. 13445
00-2-99-2-42
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
This dispute is based upon the Carrier's failure to call the Claimant, who was first
out on the overtime list, for a vacancy that commenced 12:00 midnight.
The Carrier's defense, on the merits was that the Claimant was scheduled to work
the day shift at 8:00 A.M. on March 8, 1998. He called in sick. The Carrier accepted
the Claimant's reason for not working and considered him unavailable for a day, i.e.,
a 24-hour day.
There are other arguments advanced by the Carrier in its defense. 1t argues an
untimely filed claim and that the overtime list is not a strict seniority-based list but
rather is a rotating type list. Significantly, the Claimant remained first out after March
9, 1998, and had the opportunity to work overtime at a later date.
Of and by itself, any one of the three defenses raised by the Carrier would have
been sufficient to defend it's position, but to the Board it is not necessary to go beyond
the merits. The Claimant, after laying off sick for the 8:00 A.M. shift, was not
considered available for the 12:00 midnight shift that night. The claim will be denied.
AWARD
Claim denied.
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that
an award favorable to the Claimants) not be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of July, 2000.