Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
Award No. 13545
Docket No. 13471)
00-2-99-2-66

The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee James E. Conway when award was rendered.

(National Conference of Firemen & Oilers PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:











FINDINGS:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.


Form 1 Award No. 13546
Page 2 Docket No. 13470
00-2-99-2-66

The Claimant had served as a laborer with the Carrier for approximately five years at the time of his dismissal effective October 1, 1998 for falsification of his application for employment. The record reflects that in filling out his Physical History and Examination Form in the course of pre-employment screening on November 12, 1993, the Claimant failed to disclose a prior neck injury resulting in disability compensation, although there is disagreement over whether the Claimant or his examining physician was responsible for the misrepresentation. The discrepancy came to light when the Claimant on April 14, 1997 acknowledged to a Claim Agent in the course of documenting a back injury sustained while throwing a switch on September 1,1995 that he had been injured previously while working for American Airlines in 1989 and had undergone cervical surgery in 1990 as a result.


In this claim, the Organization argues that the Claimant's discharge was not for cause inasmuch as he had fully informed his examining physician in 1993 of his prior surgery, which left a visible scar, and that he had been released for unrestricted duty with no after effects. Everything beyond the first quarter of the medical questionnaire had then been filled in by that doctor, after which he signed it. Moreover, the back injury incurred in 1995 was unrelated to the 1989 neck surgery. There having been no intent on the Claimant's part to conceal anything, the Carrier has failed to prove purposeful wrongdoing.


The Carrier takes the position that the Claimant's signature on the preemployment medical form constituted his certification of the accuracy of the information presented and, in accordance with well established authority, should result in his disqualification if found to be false.


It is undisputed that following his termination and while this dispute was pending hearing before the Board on May 8, 2000, the Claimant concluded settlement of his injury claim against the Soo Line. Although its date is not a matter of record here, in that connection the parties stipulate that he executed in the presence of witnesses in calendar year 2000 a 2-page document styled "Release of All Claims," pursuant to which, in consideration for receipt of ongoing payments for time lost and other factors, the Claimant waived all rights now asserted in this claim. That release reads in pertinent part as follows:


Form 1 Award No. 13546
Page 3 Docket No. 13470
00-2-99-2-616






Form 1 Award No. 13546
Page 4 Docket No. 13470
00-2-99-2-66



The Board concludes that the terms of the foregoing release cover the issue before us and, accordingly, the Claim must be dismissed.







This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimants) not be made.

                      NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                      By Order of Second Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of September, 2000.