Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
Award No. 14015
Docket No. 1389?
10-2-NRAB-00002-090010

The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee William R. Miller when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood Railway Carmen Division of TCIU PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:














FINDINGS:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
Form 1 Award No. 14015
Page 2 Docket No. 1389?
10-2-N RA B-00002-090010



It is the Organization's position that the Carrier required Supervisor T. Witham to drive a company truck from Rigby, Maine, to Waterville, Maine on October 17, 2007. It contends that BRC-represented employees have the exclusive right to operate highway equipment in accordance with the Classification of Work Rule and, because of that it requested that the claim be sustained.


It is the position of the Carrier that it did not violate the Agreement. It argued that company vehicles are driven by management employees and various craft employees throughout its system for many different reasons. In this instance, Supervisor Witham, who holds a Class B Maine driver's license, was qualified and available to shuttle the truck in dispute from Rigby to Waterville. The operation of company vehicles for the aforementioned purpose has been done regularly over the years, without any Organization claiming it as "their" work. Additionally, the same management employee has driven company vehicles with Carmen as passengers with no complaint from the Organization. It concluded by requesting that the claim remain denied.


The Board thoroughly reviewed the record and determined that the truck in question was driven to its newly assigned location and was not used in the commission of Carmen's work; in fact no work was performed with the truck. The Organization never refuted the fact that the truck was not used to perform any Carmen's work, nor has it offered any evidence that the moving and/or driving of company vehicles exclusively belongs to BRC-represented employees. The Board finds and holds that the Organization failed to meet its burden to prove that the Agreement was violated and, therefore, the instant claim must be denied.





Form 1 Award No. 14015
Page 3 Docket No. 1389?
10-2-NRAB-00002-090010



This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.


                    By Order of Second Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day of January 2410.