Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
Award No. 14017
Docket No. 13899
10-2-NRAB-00002-090012
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee
William R. Miller when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood Railway Carmen Division of TCIU
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Springfield Terminal Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Claim of the Employees':
1. That the Springfield Terminal Railway Company violated the
terms of our current Agreement, in particular Rule 13.1 when
they ultimately removed Carman Noel J. Leveille from service
without pay for three (3) calendar days as a result of a hearing
on January 22, 2008 in the East Deerfield Mechanical
Department.
2. That, accordingly, the Springfield Terminal Railway Company
be required to compensate Carman Noel J. Leveille in the
amount of three (3) days pay for the time that he was suspended.
This is the amount he would have earned had the Carrier not
violated the Agreement."
FINDINGS:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all
the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934.
Form 1 Award No. 14017
Page 2 Docket No. 13899
10-2-NRAB-00002-090012
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
On January 10, 2008, the Carrier notified the Claimant to report for a formal
Investigation on January 22, 2008, concerning the following charge:
"Charges: Negligence in the performance of your duties.
Specifically: On the morning of January 2, 2008, you were ordered by
your direct supervisor, Paul Tringafi, to load rolls of paper from the
car shop area into the Box Trailer 1041 and take it to GMX to be off
loaded.
Specifically: On this morning around 10:30 hours while you were
loading one of the rolls of paper into the Box Trailer 1041, that was
parked down in front of the Engine House loading dock, once inside
the trailer with the forklift, the paper on your forks shifted and you
reacted by grabbing the mast lift lever, which made the mast go up
punching a hole in the roof of the box trailer 1041.
You are charged with failure to comply with Rule P278, entitled
MATERIAL HANDLING
Specifically, load on forklift truck must not be raised or lowered
traveling. Care must be taken when working with the forklift."
On February 19, 2008, the Claimant was notified that he had been found
guilty, as charged, and was assessed a three calendar days suspension.
It is the position of the Organization that the Carrier erred in suspending the
Claimant. It argued that the Claimant, while working alone, was safely loading
paper rolls that weigh approximately 1,000 pounds when one of the rolls began to
Form 1 Award No. 1401?
Page 3 Docket No. 13899
10-2-NRAB-00002-090012
fall off of the forklift while the machine was not moving. He reacted by grabbing
the mast lift lever to stop the roll from falling and, unfortunately, he poked a hole in
the roof of Box Trailer 1041. According to the Organization, the incident was an
unavoidable accident which happened to a ten plus year employee with a good work
record. It concluded by arguing that the discipline should be set aside.
The Carrier argued that there is no disagreement that the Claimant poked a
hole in Box Trailer 1041. It points out that the Claimant admitted that while he was
loading paper, a roll of paper was falling off of the forks, so he reacted by grabbing
the mast lift lever, which punched a hole in the roof of the trailer. According, to the
testimony of Assistant Superintendent, Mechanical Department - West, J. Rae, the
Claimant admitted that his reaction of lifting the lever too quickly was a mistake.
Therefore, based upon the testimony of the Supervisor as well as the Claimant, the
Carrier argued that it met its burden of proof. It concluded by arguing that the
discipline was appropriate and should not be set aside.
The Board reviewed the transcript and record evidence and determined that
there were no procedural violations involved in the handling of the case. There is
absolute proof that the Claimant was the only individual involved in poking a hole
in the trailer. There are some instances in which an accident is unavoidable, but
this is not one of those cases. The accident could have been avoided if the Claimant
had not overreacted with too quick a movement of the mast lift lever. The record is
clear that the Carrier met its burden to prove that the Claimant was guilty, as
charged.
The only issue remaining is whether the suspension was appropriate. The
Claimant at the time of the incident had a little less than ten years of seniority with a
previous Letter of Reprimand on his personnel record. The purpose of discipline is
to correct an employee's inappropriate behavior. In this instance, the Carrier
issued a progressive discipline of three calendar days' suspension to the Claimant as
a forewarning that he must strive to work carefully. The Board finds and holds that
the three calendar days' suspension was corrective in nature and not arbitrary,
excessive or capricious. Accordingly, the discipline will not be set aside.
Form I Award No. 1401?
Page 4 Docket No. 13899
10-2-N RA B-00002-090012
AWARD
Claim denied.
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders
that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day of January 2010.