Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
Award No. 14028
Docket No. 13913
10-2-NRAB-00002-090021
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee
James E. Conway when award was rendered.
(International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(BNSF Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"(1) In accord with the provisions of Rule 32 of the controlling
Agreement the employees at the Kansas City (Argentine and
North Kansas City) BNSF Mechanical Department Facility
initiated claims under the dates of April 15 and 29, 2008, relative
to the establishment of seniority for Kansas City Mechanical
Department Electricians J. I. Delong, J. D. Ragland, D. S.
Keltner, Charles Haywood and Oscar Garza.
(2). As a result of the parties being unable to reach a mutually
agreeable resolution in this dispute, the employees present to this
Board the question of interpretation of the applicable rule of the
controlling Agreement."
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all
the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21,1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Form 1
Page 2
Award No. 14028
Docket No. 13913
10-2-NRAB-00002-090021
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
On July 6, 2004, the Carrier hired five employees. DeLong, Ragland and
Keltner were hired as Journeyman Electricians. Haywood and Garza were hired as
Laborers, but eventually entered the Electrical Apprentice Program and became
Electricians. They were then assigned seniority dates of July 6, 2004, the same dates
listed for the three employees hired as Journeyman Electricians. Those employees
submitted a claim protesting their ranking. On November 20, 2008, an agreement
was reached providing that the relative ranking of the employees involved should
be in accordance with the dates their final applications for employment were
completed. Pursuant to that understanding, based upon the following dates of
original applications or Apprenticeship Application Form completions, seniority
dates were assigned as follows:
J. I. Delong 2/23/04 8:48 A.M.
J. D. Ragland 2/25/04 6:58 P.M.
C. Haywood 4/02/04 6:59 P.M.
O. Garza 4/06/04 7:14 P.M.
D. S. Keltner 4/07/04 9:51 P.M.
This agreement resulted in a mix of what the Carrier had originally assigned
and what the Organization had proposed. On April 29, 2008, the IBEW Local
submitted a claim on behalf of Delong, Ragland and Keltner stating that Rule 32
had been violated and asserting that they should have been placed ahead of Messrs.
Haywood and Garza.
Rule 32 reads, in part, as follows:
"(a) The seniority of each employe shall start from the time he first
performs actual service in the craft or class in which employed
with the Company as evidenced by clock or other registration.
The seniority of two or more employed at the same time in the
same seniority district will be determined by the order in which
the final employment forms were completed. Such forms shall
show the date and time completed."
While there is room for honest debate on how the governing Rule applies to
the facts of record due to the apparent tension between standards set forth therein,
Form 1 Award No. 14028
Page 3 Docket No. 13913
10-2-NRAB-00002-090021
in the view of the Board, the proper application of the Rule requires that Delong,
Raglan and Keltner be ranked ahead of Haywood and Garza, and that their
ranking should be in that order. Although hired on the same date as the
Journeymen Electricians, Haywood and Garza finished their Apprenticeships and
commenced work as Electricians long after Delong, Raglan and Keltner first
performed actual service in the craft. Garza, for example, according to the record,
finished his Apprenticeship of 976 days on April 11, 2008 and then established a
seniority date of July 6, 2004, i.e., the same date the Journeymen Electricians were
hired.
When there is apparent conflict in contract terms, the rules of construction
require that competing provisions be reconciled when possible in ways that give
meaning to all terms. Here, because it is clear that first performance is the primary
test, and it is equally undisputed which employees first performed service in the
craft or class, the spirit of the Rule is best honored by ending the analysis at that
point. If the intended meaning of "employed at the same time" is pursued, and a
ranking based upon completion of employment forms adopted, the results would
require the Board to disregard or discount the plain meaning of the first sentence of
the Rule. A more reasonable result in this instance would interpret the phrase
"employed at the same time" to mean employed in the sense of performing work.
The claim is sustained. Kansas City Mechanical Department Electricians J. 1.
Delong, J. D. Ragland, D. S. Keltner, C. Haywood and O. Garza are to be ranked on
the appropriate seniority rosters in that order.
AWARD
Claim sustained.
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders
that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) be made. The Carrier is ordered to make
the Award effective on or before 30 days following the postmark date the Award is
transmitted to the parties.
Form 1
Page 4
Award No. 14028
Docket No. 13913
10-2-NRAB-00002-090021
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTME
By Order of Second Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 3rd day of November 2010.
BOARD