DISPUTE.-" Employees claim that in requiring employees to lay off rive days each month in addition to laying off one day each week from larch 20, 1933. to April 1, 1934, the Carrier violated the current schedule rules as well as special verbal agreement entered into September 30, 19;;1, and that senior employees should be paid for time lost on account of such additional lay off."
FINDINGS-The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all tile evherx·e, finds that:
The carrier and the employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employees within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1 p34.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
The parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.During the period of time covered in the dispute there existed ail agreement between the parties governing the hours of service and working conditions of employees therein designated, from which agreement complainant party cites, among others, the following rules, to wit:
The specific "claim" which goes to the rights of the parties under the Agreement cited is remanded for adjustment between them per the terms thereof and per such mutual understanding as may have been loll in conference belweeu them on September 30, 1931.
Olaino for reimbursement of wages said to have been lost by "Senior Emplcpees " is denied.
By Order of Third Division: