PARTIES TO DISPUTE:



DISPUTE (G. W. Lawyer).-



FINDINGS.-The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier and the employee involved !it this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.

The parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.

The case being deadlocked, Lloyd K. Garrison wits called in as Referee to sit with the Division as a member thereof.

There is in evidence The Pullman Company Rules Governing Working Conditions for Conductors, effective December 10, 1923, mill Mediation Agreement of March 1, 1928.

The service performed was as follows:

Pullman company paid Employees claim pay

8-19-32 Left New York 3:45 P. M.-Line 1554. 8-20-32 Arrived Watertown 7:45 A. M____.._.-._.

.'Layover" 9 me. 45 mins.___.-______.______

8-20-32 Left W atertnwn 5:30 P. M.-Troop Special-.
8-21-32 Arrived New York 6:40 A. M.
Elapsed time 33 his. 55 mina.

8-26-32 Left New York 1:20 P. M.-Line 1470. Ar- (1 day-_ -__ _1 day,
rived Boston 7:5,0 P. M. l1 day-held for service-.-. 1 day.
8-28-32 Left Baston2:30P.bl.-Line1140__ _ _ lday_ ____._______.__._. Snayheldforservice.



r held for service.




The record indicates that there was no regular layover at Watertown and the allowance of one day for the New York to Watertown run evidently included no allowance for any layover at Watertown. The claim of held for service at Watertown should, therefore, be allowed on the basis of the principles already established in Docket PC-105, Award No. 259 of this Division.

With respect to the claim for an extra eight hours held for service in Boston: The record indicates that the allowance of one day for the trip to Boston and one day for the trip back included a layover which started on the conductor's arrival in Boston on the evening of the 20th and expired some time during the following day, certainly before 4:00 P. M., the testimony in the proceedings before the Conductors' Adjustment Board being to the effect that the end of the layover would be some time in the morning. At the end of the layover, which certainly was before 4:00 P. M., the conductor entered upon a period of being held for service, which, up to midnight on the 27th, would entitle him to eight hours, and from midnight to 2:30 P. M. on the 28th would entitle him to another eight hours. He was paid for a single stretch of eight hours and is entitled to an additional eight hours.



Claim sustained.
By Order of Third Division:

Attest
                        H. A. JoaNsoa, Secretary.


Dated at Chicago, Dlinols, this 9th day of May 1938.