NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

THIRD DIVISION




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES


THE CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC

RAILWAY CO.


(Frank O. Lowden, James E. Gorman, Joseph B. Fleming, Trustees)

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the Rock Island System Board of Adjustment, Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes, on the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway, in behalf of Claude 0. Bradford, yard clerk, rate $146.20 per month, St. Louis, Mo., for the payment of an additional five (5) hours at pro rata rate on each of the following days (Sundays)







STATEMENT OF FACTS: The following statement of facts was jointly certified by the parties: "Position of yard clerk (old), rate $136.00 (new rate, $146.20), assigned hours 2:30 P. M. to 11:00 P. M., at St. Louis, Mo., has been worked on a 7-day assignment for several years. On vacancy bulletin No. 35, dated Kansas City, Mo. August 4th, 1937, this position was advertised as vacant, as follows:



On assignment bulletin No. 36, dated Kansas City, Mo. August 11th, 1937, the following award was made:


'St. Louis, Mo.-Yard Clerk.






On bulletin No. 40, dated Kansas City, Mo. September 7th, 1937, correction was made in original bulletin No. 35 of August 4th, 1937, bulletin reading as follows:


'Position now vacant for which bids will be received in this office until 12:00 Noon, Tuesday, September 14, 1937:


930-8 35

"Applying Rule 57 to the instant case, we find that



"Mr. Bradford's assignment of seven days per week was properly reduced to six days per week and Mr. Bradford remained on the six day assignment under an agreed to interpretation, he was properly called and paid under the provisions of Rule 57, and there is no contract basis on which the employes can sustain the contention they are now making."


There is in evidence an agreement between the parties bearing effective date of January 1, 1931.


OPINION OF BOARD: Under Rule 54 and the joint interpretation thereof dated February 11, 1931, and Rule 57, it would appear that the practice herein followed is permissible.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


That the carrier and the employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and


No violation of the rules is shown.



Claim denied.

              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of Third Division


ATTEST: H. A. Johnson
Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Ill., this 2nd day of August, 1939.