BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood for payment of a minimum eight (8) hour day to Mail Truckman Leroy Ping, on December 10th, 11th, and 12th, 1940; to Mail Trackman F. R. Parris on December 11th, 12th, and 13th, 1940; and to Mail Trackman, W. B. Sexton on December 13th and 14th, 1940.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Mail Truckman Leroy Ping, seniority date February 24th, 1934, was worked and paid as follows on dates shown;
Mail Truckman F. R. Parris, Seniority date August 21st, 1936, was worked and paid as follows on dates shown;
Mail Trackman W. B. Sexton, seniority date October 19th, 1939, was worked and paid as follows on dates shown;
"Rule No. 'i7. Except as otherwise provided in Rules 38 to 44, both inclusive, eight (8) consecutive hours' work, exclusive of the meal period, shall constitute a day's work."
"Rule No. 39. Employes required to report for work at regular starting time, and prevented from performing service by conditions beyond control of the carrier, will be paid for actual time held with a minimum of two (2) hours.
"if worked any portion of the day, under such conditions, up to a total of four (4) hours, a minimum of four (4) hours shall be allowed. If worked in excess of four (4) hours, a minimum of eight (8) hours shall apply.
":111 time under this rule shall be at pro rata. This: rule does not apply to employes who are engaged to take care of fluctuating or temporarily increased work which cannot be handled by the regular forces; nor shall it apply to regular employes who lay off of their own accord before completion of the day's work."
"Rule No. 4. Seniority begins at the time the employe's pay starts on the seniority district and in the seniority class to which assigned, and will apply only in filling new positions or vacancies, and in the reduction of forces. Where two or more employes enter the service upon the same day, the appointing oflrcer shall be the judge, in establishing their seniority rights."
"Seniority District. The following seniority district is hereby continually established over which employes covered by seniority roster shall be permitted to exercise their seniority. Seniority district thus established shall be continued unless and until changed . by mutual agreement between the Management and the accredited Representative of the employes: Seniority district to include all positions and all employment of all that class of Clerical, office, station and storehouse employes covered in scope Rule No. 1. of current Agreement with the St. Joseph Union Depot Company."
fluctuating or temporary character, such as that which is made a basis of dispute in this instance, and the construction placed upon the rule by the carrier has been upheld either definitely or by unmistakable implication in every award of the Third Division bearing on this particular subject.
The record of practice is conclusively evidenced by timerolls (Carrier's Exhibit A), which show that the regular force at the St. Joseph Union Depot has been augmented by part-time employes for several days immediately before Christmas every year since 1923, and that such employes have been compensated for actual hours of service.
In the light of the abundance of evidence which supports the Carrier's position in this case, including record of precedent established by this tribunal, the position of the petitioning organization is not tenable and should not be sustained.
OPINION OF BOARD: This case is controlled by our Award No. 2023 of this date and the claim must be allowed for the reasons therein stated.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the carrier and the employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and
Dissent is expressed to this Award for the reasons given in our dissent to Award No. 2023, Docket CL-1964, issued concurrently.