NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of System Bridge and Building Gang Foreman, H. A. Delonjay and members of his crew that they be paid pro rata rate for all time traveling in advance of and after the completion of their regular 8 hour assignment from February 2nd 1942, and all subsequent dates that outfit cars were stationed at Riverside, Illinois, and the crew was assigned to perform work on bridge 13.55.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The B. & B. gang in charge of B. & B. Foreman H. A. Delonjay is a System B. & B. gang subject to assignment anywhere on the Burlington Railroad. This crew is assigned to outfit cars, which outfit cars constitute their headquarters.
Some time prior to February 2, 1942 Foreman H. A. Delonjay's System B. & B. crew was assigned to work on the Chicago Division, the outfit cars being spurred out at Riverside, Illinois. The hours of assignment of this gang were from 8 :00 A. M. to 4:30 P. M. with 30 minutes off for lunch. Prior to February 2, 1942 this B. & B. gang started work at its scheduled starting time at Riverside where the outfit was stationed and rode their motor car to Bridge 13.55, approximately 3 miles West of Riverside, where they were employed during the day, and then rode their motor car back to Riverside in the evening, reaching the outfit cars, their headquarters, at 4:30 P. M. , iII
Under date of January 30, 1942 Foreman Delonjay received instructions reading:
The agreement in effect between the Carrier and the Brotherhood is by reference made a part of this Statement of Facts.
POSITION OF EMPLOYES: As stated in Employes' Statement of Facts, the B. & B. gang in charge of Foreman H. A. Delonjay is a System B. & B. gang assigned to outfit cars, and that some time prior to February 2, 1942 this B. & B. gang was assigned to work in the Chicago Terminal, its outfit cars being stationed at Riverside, Illinois.
Paragraph (d) covers general exceptions from travel time pay. It pro vides, first, that travel time pay will not be allowed to employes while traveling in the exercise of seniority rights; second, that travel time pay will not be allowed to employes while traveling between their homes and designated assembling points; and third, that travel time pay will not be allowed to employes while traveling for other personal reasons. Here again, taken in relation with Rule 44 which designates assembling points, we find that traveling time is not payable under the circumstances involved in this case.
It is plainly seen that there was no intention on the part of the parties to the agreement to pay for the travel time referred to in the claim. Consequently, it appears that the petitioning organization has, by this case, instigated an exploration or fishing expedition to see if it might not in this manner enlarge the agreement. The Management relies upon the foregoing rules and evidence to show that:
OPINION OF BOARD: This is a claim of System B. & B. Gang Foreman H. A. Delonjay and members of his crew that they be paid pro rata for all time traveling in advance of and after the completion of their regular 8-hour assignment from February 2, 1942, and all subsequent days that outfit cars were stationed at Riverside, Illinois. The Employes state that this crew is assigned to outfit cars, which cars constitute their headquarters.
Sometime prior to February 2, 1942, this crew was assigned to work on the Chicago Division, the outfit cars being spurred out at Riverside, Illinois. The hours of assignment of this gang were from 8:00 A. M. to 4:30 P. M. with thirty minutes off for lunch. Prior to February 2, 1942, this gang started work at its scheduled starting time at Riverside where the outfit car was stationed and rode their motor car to Bridge 13.55, approximately three miles west of Riverside where they were employed during the day and then rode their car back to Riverside in the evening, reaching the outfit car, their headquarters, at 4:30 P. M. Under date of January 30, 1942, they were instructed to commence and end their assignment at Bridge 13.55 and to use suburban service going to and from the point of work.
Employes rely upon schedule Rules 44 and 48 (b). This Referee does not believe that Rule 48 (b) applies in this case. The rule which governs here is Schedule Rule 44, which is as follows:
It will be noted that Rule 44 provides: "On Line When in outfit cars, point at which work is located," so clearly under this rule the assembling point where employes' time would start was at the point at which work is located. Finally, the last paragraph of Rule 44 specifically provides that payment will not be made for time riding on street cars, regular or shop trains to get to the assembling point. This record shows tere were regular trains operating on schedule.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and