NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood:
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Certain work in connection with manitenance of building No. 10, Sebastian, Texas, and building No. 81, Harlingen, Texas, had been let to and was being performed by a contractor and, thus performed by employes who had no seniority rights in the bridge and building department on the railroad.
On November 25, 1943, Thanksgiving Day, the claimants, regular employes in the bridge and building department, were laid off and lost time while the outsiders, employes of the contractor, were working in the performance of work to which the claimants were justly entitled.
The agreement in effect between the Carrier and the Brotherhood is by reference a part of this Statement of Facts.
POSITION OF EMPLOYES: Rule 1, Scope, of agreement in effect between the Missouri Pacific Lines and the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes reads:
in this case are entitled to eight hours at the time and one-half rate on November 25, 1943 (Thanksgiving Day) therefore, it is the position of the Carrier that the contention of the Employes should be dismissed and the claim, accordingly, denied.
OPINION OF BOARD: This is a companion case to Docket MW-2922. As far as the rights of the parties are concerned, the same principle is involved here as there, though there is a slight difference in the facts involved.
For the reasons there stated we hold that Carrier violated the Agreement in assigning the work here involved to an outside contractor. See Awards 2812, 2819, 3060. Compare Awards 2701, 1453.
Only one day is involved in this claim: viz, Thanksgiving Day, November 25, 1943. The record shows that on November 25, the contractor worked at Harlingen: 1 Carpenter and 1 Helper-4 hours each and on the same day the contractor worked at Sebastian 2 Carpenters and 1 Laborer, 8 hours each. Recovery should be limited to the actual time lost on that day and the award apportioned to employes in order of seniority.
It appears that no authorization has been received from employes R. Guilerez and Stanley Soeldo. The Board is without authority to consider their claim.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and
Claim sustained in the amount specified in the Opinion except claim of employes R. Guilerez and Stanley Soeldo not considered because no authorization has been received from them.