PARTIES TO DISPUTE:



STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of The Order of Railroad Telegraphers on the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company that:


1. The Carrier improperly abolished two telegraph schedule positions without abolishing the duties covered by the Telegraphers' Agreement, assigned hours 6:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m., and 2:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m., occupied, respectively, by John Catanzaro and W. J. Keegan, at Buffalo Junction (formerly known as Erie Junction), New York, effective July 30, 1945;


2. The Carrier in consequence of such improper abolishment shall be required to re-establish said positions, return the former incumbents thereto, and pay for any wage loss plus any expenses incurred; also, any other employes who were adversely affected by the operation of seniority rules shall be returned to former positions with pay for any wage loss plus any expenses incurred.


EMPLOYES' STATEMENTS OF FACT: An agreement by and between the parties, bearing effective date of July 1, 1940 as to rules and December 27, 1943 as to rates of pay, is in evidence; copies thereof are on file with the National Railroad Adjustment Board.


The Telegraphers' Agreement of October 1, 1919 listed at Erie Junction (now Buffalo Junction) two positions classified as "Operator-switchtenders". These postions were abolished following the return of railroads to private owners during 1920, because the Erie Railroad no longer used Lehigh Valley facilities. Effective August 5, 1935 the Erie Railroad resumed use of Lehigh Valley facilities and the two operator-switchtender positions were reestablished and continued until July 30, 1945. The duties of the operatorswitchtender positions, listed by the Carrier, were to block trains by telephone, handle train orders, and throw two hand-thrown ground switches on each occasion a train left the Lehigh rails for Erie rails, or vice versa-an average of 11 or 12 operations in each 16-hour period.


Some time prior to January 31, 1945 (exact date unknown), the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen made claim against the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company for jurisdiction over the throwing of ground switches at Buffalo Junction. The dispute was filed with Division One, National Railroad Adjustment Board. Subsequently, and before Division One acted on the dispute, by agreement or unilaterally, the dispute was withdrawn from Division One for further consideration on the property. The parties to that dispute, namely, th! Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen and the Lehigh



3459-11 609

to or from Buffalo Station (Lehigh Valley Railroad) enter and leave the main tracks of the Lehigh Valley Railroad over which they operate. The carrier now maintains at this junction three telegraphers' positions, part of whose duties as now assigned consists of throwing the main track junction switch and the two main track crossover switches used in the above operation by Erie trains. These three switches are individual ground level switches, and the request of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen is that the throwing of these switches by telegraph operators be dis, continued and same be assigned to employes coming within the scope of their agreement, namely, switchtenders. This request is based on the application of the roles of their agreement cited and in evidence.







After the decision in the Trainmen's case, negotiations were held with the Committee representing Telegraphers in connection with the change necessary to comply with the Trainmen's Award, and although the Trainmen extended the time limit provided in the award for making their decision effective, no other settlement could be effected with the Telegraphers than to transfer all work under the scope of their agreement to other positions under their agreement, which was done, and the positions as telegrapher-switchtender were abolished July 30, 1945, and positions as switchtenders established, whose only duty was the throwing of individual ground lever connected switches out on the track.


The question in this case is jurisdictional as between the Telegraphers and the Trainmen, involving the right of Telegraphers to throw switches on the track, which are not connected in any way for handling from a tower, building, etc. It is the contention of Trainmen that the handling of such switches is work which must be performed by Trainmen, and in view of the award given them in their case and the entire abolishment of all other telegrapher duties at this point, there is no justification in the claim of the Telegraphers for the positions in question to be rstored, as the only remaining work at the location is the handling of outside switches connected on the tracks.


Therefore, there is no violation of the Telegraphers' Agreement in having switchtenders handle the switches at Buffalo Junction, and we ask that the request of the Telegraphers in this case be denied.


OPINION OF BOARD: The effective Agreement between the parties, dated July 1, 1940 as to rules and December 27, 1943 as to rates of pay, is in evidence. The Telegraphers' Agreement of October 1, 1919, listed, at what is now called Buffalo Junction, two positions of Operator-Switch Tenders-their duties to block trains, throw switches, receive and deliver train orders and other messages to trains. Without repeating the history of these positions since they were created, suffice it to say, they were abolished by the Carrier July 30, 1945.


On January 31, 1945 a Reviewing Board found that the handling of the three ground level switches; that is, the practice of Telegraphers throwing these switches be discontinued within thirty days, holding that this phase of the work belonged to trainmen.

3459-12 610

On May 10, 1945, the Carrier filed application with the Interstate Commerce Commission to expedite the movement of trains, requesting modification of the automatic block signal system at Buffalo Junction, for a change in the wire and signal facilities. This was following the decision of the Reviewing Board in 1945. The request was granted.






The Employes describe the operation and the communication necessary to permit the movements between the two carriers at this location as follows:



There is in evidence a clearance card, upon which the station, date and item six (For Interlocking Signal) signal governing movement is filled out. There is also in evidence three train orders. The Employes say these matters are of record.


The foregoing constitutes the relevant and material facts. The Employes contend that under the facts of record the Carrier has violated the Scope, Rule 2 and Rule 74 of the Agreement. These rules appear in the Employes' Submission; that by the arrangement as made, there is communication work remaining which belongs to the Telegraphers; that the duties of a Block-Operator are to clear the Block before the train is permitted to proceed and then by certain indications, permit the train to proceed; that in this case it was necessary to go to he telephone and answer it to receive instructions from the Signalman.


We believe that under the facts as disclosed by the record, the Carrier has not violated the applicable agreement. We are cognizant of the language relied upon by the employes, quoted in .Awards 1281 and 1283. We believe, however, that Awards 1305 1320, 1553 and 1671 which overruled Award 1283 and that part of Award 1281 upon which the employes rely, and rein-

3459-13 611

stated Award 1145 which was overruled by Award 1283, govern in the case before us, and are controlling. We conclude that the Carrier has not violated the Agreement.

FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:

That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 11, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and










ATTEST: H. A. Johnson
Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 10th day of March, 1947.