BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that the Carrier violates the rules of the Clerks' Agreement at Marion, Ohio, when it refuses to compensate Extra Clerk for service performed on Sundays at time and one-half rate, and
That Carrier shall now compensate employe J. P. Rubins for all Sundays worked, retroactive to May 13, 1945, at time and one-half rate.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Employe Rubin is an Extra Clerk holding no regular assignment. Rubin worked the first trick position of outside caller, Marion, Ohio, rate $5.59i/4 per day on Sunday, May 13, 1945. On Sunday, May 27, 1945, he worked the third trick position rated at $5.69ya per day. He has continued to work as an Extra Clerk on numerous other Sundays since May 13, 1945, for which service he was compensated at pro rata rate of position worked. All of the positions involved are necessary to the continuous operation of the carrier, and are worked seven days each week in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30 of the Clerks' Agreement. Sunday is the normal rest day for all Extra Clerks.
POSITION OF EMPLOYES: There is in effect between the parties an Agreement bearing an effective date of December 1, 1943, amended July 1, 1945, which contains the following rules:
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant was an extra clerk from May 13, 1945 to June 27, 1945. During this period he worked several Sundays on positions necessary to the continuous operation of the Carrier and was compensated at the pro rata rate. The Organization contends that Claimant was entitled to be paid at the time and one-half rate under Rule 30, the Sunday and Holiday rule of the current Agreement. The pertinent part of this rule is:
Rule 20 (c) and Memorandum of Agreement No. 1 have no bearing upon the present controversy. The record shows that Claimant was an extra man having no regular assignment. It is not disputed that if the regular occupants of the positions Claimant worked had performed the work themselves they would have been compensated at the pro rata rate.
Under the Sunday and Holiday rule, all Sunday work is to be compensated at the time and one-half rate except employes necessary to the continuous operation of the Carrier who have been regularly assigned to such service. Claimant was not assigned within the meaning of this rule. Consequently, in the absence of any other controlling rule, Claimant is entitled to be paid at the time and one-half rate under this rule. Award 596. And the fact that the regular occupant of the position would have been compensated at the pro rata rate, had he worked it, does not change the application of the rule. Award 597.
The Carrier contends that the result is controlled by Rules 7 (f) and 20 (d) of the current Agreement which provide:
We find nothing in these two rules which purports to modify the Sunday and Holiday rule or to in any manner deal with Sunday work as such. Rule 7 (f) deals with seniority and the right to perform certain work. It in no way purports to fix the rate of pay or to modify the Sunday and Holiday rule with reference to the rate therein provided for Sunday work.
Rule 20 (d) likewise deals with matters other than Sunday work. It provides the rate of pay for extra employes under certain conditions therein specified, but Sunday work is not alluded to. The first sentence of the rule deals with the rate of pay where an extra employe worked more than one 3505-7 200
position in a twenty-four hour period. The second sentence simply provides that each position shall be considered separately and dealt with on that basis. The third sentence provides that work in excess of eight hours on each position will be paid for as overtime. The fourth sentence provides that an extra man who works more than six (6) separate assignments within six (6) days will be paid time and one-half for the seventh, after which another six-day assignment period will begin. Nothing appears in the rule which even purports to change the effect of Rule 30, the Sunday and Holiday rule.
There being no rules modifying Rule 30, we are obliged to give effect to that rule as written. The applications of the rule as made in Awards 596 and 597 control the decision of this dispute. An affirmative award is required.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of bearing thereton, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and
Claim sustained as to Sundays worked from May 13, 1945 to June 27, 1945, inclusive.