PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
PORTLAND TERMINAL COMPANY

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood:


(1) Thai; under the application of letter addressed to M. T. Simmons, General Chairman, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes, by S. G. Phillips, Engineer Maintenance of Way, under date of February 16, 1944, bridge and building foreman and equipment inspectors are entitled to six days sick leave with pay in any one year;


(2) That Bridge and Building Foreman E. B. Sweet, who was off duty on account of sickness from February 26 to March 14, 1945, shall be paid for; six days sick leave.


(3) That Bridge and Building Foreman Anson B. Stewart, who was off duty on account of sickness from January 25 to February 1, 1946, shall be paid for six days sick leave.


EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Memorandum of Agreement under dates of February 16, 1944 and February 13, 1945, and letter under date of February 16, 1944, pertaining to bridge and building foremen and other classes of employes, read:


MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES

AND

MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY

PORTLAND TERMINAL COMPANY






Effective this date, Bridge and Building Foremen and Work Equipment Inspector, Maintenance of Way Department are included within the scope of the Agreement with the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes effective May 28, 1942, and the provisions of that Agreement, except as hereinafter provided, apply.


3566-13 554

Brotherhood representatives would, of a certainty, not agree to the language contained therein.

In further proof of the Position of the Carrier that the Agreement of February 16, 1944, was entirely superseded or set aside, the attention of your Board is directed to the following:













The Parties to this dispute have exchanged copy of their Rebuttal to the other's Position.

OPINION OF BOARD: On February 16, 1944, a Memorandum of Agreement, was entered into whereby Bridge and Building Foremen and Work Equipment Inspectors, Maintenance of Way Department, were included within the scope of the Agreement between the Maintenance of Way Employes and this Carrier. On the same day, Carrier's representative wrote the Organization's representative in part as follows:



On February 13, 1945, a second Memorandum of Agreement was entered into under date of February 13, 1945. This latter Agreement dealt
3566-14 555

with and provided for the payment of overtime for Bridge and Building Foremen and Work Equipment Inspectors. It followed the identical language of the Memorandum of Agreement dated February 16, 1944; except where changes were necessary to provide for overtime pay. We think the readoption in terms of that part of the prior Memorandum of Agreement of February '16 1944, other than that pertaining to overtime pay, in the Agreement of February 13, 1945, carries into it the agreed upon interpretation of the former. The use of the words, "This Agreement supersedes agreement effective February 16, 1944," evidences no intent to change the agreed upon interpretation of language adopted in terms in the latter from the former. It evidences an intention that all terms of the former agreement except those dealing with overtime should have the same meaning as before. These Claimants are therefore entitled to six days sick leave with pay as alleged in their claim.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:




That the Carrier and Employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and









ATTEST: H. A. Johnson
Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 22nd day of May, 1947.