PARTIES TO DISPUTE:



CHICAGO & WESTERN INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Violation of Rule 2 (a) and 2 (c) of an existing agreement and memorandum of agreement dated June 20, 1940.


A further claim is made for compensation for all employes affected by this violation beginning with November 17, 1946.


EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS; On or about November 17, 1946, the Chicago Western Indiana Railroad Company instructed baggage handlers in its baggage department to remove all bags from trains of the Erie Railroad Company, entering that terminal bearing a luggage check placed there by the coach porters. They were further instructed to handle this luggage by baggage truck and deliver it either to the parcel check room of that terminal or to the Parmelee office in that terminal. The handling of luggage from all Erie passengers of Erie trains in that terminal prior to the new order above mentioned, had been done by red caps under a contract signed June 12 1939. Subsequent to this change in the handling of baggage from the Erie trains, the Chicago Western Indiana Railroad Company issued an order decreasing the number of red caps employed by eight persons. All documents, correspondence in connection with this case are attached as Exhibit A.


POSITION OF EMPLOYE The position of the employe is that Rule 2 (a) and (c) of its agreement with this carrier and its memorandum of understanding of June 1940 has been violated. Rule 2 reads as follows with emphasis on 2 (a) and (c).








It will be noted that Rule 2 definitely describes the duties of red caps. Those duties specifically include the handling of baggage, packages or other



3851-6 485

OPINION OF BOARD: Based upon all of the facts and circumstances of this particular case, the Board is not disposed to disturb the action of the Carrier.

FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, aftei giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:

That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

    That the Board is not disposed to disturb the action of the Carrier.


                  AWARD


    Claims denied.


              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

              By Order of Third Division


ATTEST: H. A. Johnson
Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 7th day of April, 1948.