STATEMENT OF CLAIM: * * * Claim of the Order of Railroad Conductors, Pullman System, in which we contend that The Pullman Company violated Rules 10, 22, 23, 25, 38 and 48 of the Agreement between The Pullman Company and its conductors when it permitted Southern Pacific employes, not covered by the Agreement between The Pullman Company and its conductors, to lift Pullman tickets at Tucson, Arizona.
We contend that The Pullman Company violated Rules 25, 38 and 48 of the Agreement between The Pullman Company and its conductors, when on March 27, 1947, it changed the jurisdiction over conductors' work arising at Tucson, Arizona, from the Los Angeles District to the El Paso District.
We now claim that extra conductors of the Los Angeles District, entitled to the work at Tucson each day, as shown on list attached, be compensated from February 28, 1947, (60 days prior to date of this claim) to and including August 7, 1947, for the service denied them by payment for a deadhead trip Los Angeles to Tucson, as provided in Rules 7, 22 and 23. by payment for actual time with a minimum of 3:45 hours for station duty service they would have rendered at Tucson, and by payment for a deadhead trip service they would have rendered at Tucson, and by payment for a deadhead trip Tucson to Los Angeles, as provided in Rules 7, 22 and 23; and that Conductor J. A. Bryant, and all other conductors of the Los Angeles District, be compensated each day at the daily rate of the full time station duty assignment established as per Memorandum of Understanding dated August 8, 1947, during the time other than Los Angeles District conductors are permitted to hold that assignment.
That the dispute was certified to the Third Division of the Adjustment Board ex parte by complainant party; and
That no hearing thereon has been held and under date of May 20, 1949. the complainant party addressed a formal communication to the Acting Secretary of the Third Division withdrawing this case, which request is hereby granted.