STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood:
(1) That the Carrier violated the Agreement by not reimbursing Welder B. V. Baysinger and Welder's Helper S. J. Gowen, Memphis Division for the actual necessary meals incurred by them during the period October 14 to 31, 1947, while they were working away from their assigned territory;
(2) That the claimants should now be reimbursed for $36.00 each, the amount of their actual and necessary meal expenses for the period referred to in part 1 of this claim.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Welder B. V. Baysinger and Welder's Helper S. J. Gowen were at the time this claim arose, regularly assigned with headquarters on the Memphis Division at Wynne, Arkansas.
But, during the period October 14 to October 31, 1947, these claimants were temporarily transferred to work on the Missouri Division at Poplar Bluffs.
During this period, while so transferred, they incurred a total of $36.00 each as expenses for meals.
The claimants submitted to the Carrier their bill for these meals expenses. The Carrier has refused to pay these meals expenses.
The Agreement between the parties to the dispute dated July 1, 1938 and subsequent amendments and interpretations are by reference made a part of this Statement of Facts.
POSITION OF EMPLOYES: Rules 25 and 26 of the effective agreement state as follows:
Missouri Division they lived in outfit cars, therefore, under the provisions of the agreement they were not entitled to expenses. The claims are without merit and should be denied as there is no rule to support claims for expenses for these men.
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimants were regularly assigned as a Welder and a Welder's Helper on the Memphis Division of this Carrier. They were used on the Missouri Division from October 14 to 31, 1947. They claim reimbursement for their actual and necessary meal expenses during this period.
The record shows that these employes were furnished with bunk or outfit cars while working on the Missouri Division. The Carrier contends that the bunk or outfit cars constitutes their headquarters and that no liability exists for the payment of expenses by the Carrier. The Organization contends that these employes were moved off their assigned territories and are therefore entitled to expenses under Rules 25 and 26, current Agreement, which provide:
The controlling portion of the Agreement is Rule 26. This rule plainly says that employes taken off their assigned territory to work elsewhere will be furnished meals and lodging if not accompanied by their outfit cars. In the present case, claimants were accompanied by their outfit cars. Under the plain words of Rule 26, they were not entitled to expenses.
The contention that Rule 25 is controlling has no merit. This rule deals with temporary or emergency travel service. It covers situations where the employe is directed to leave his home station in temporary or emergency service. It covers time on the road as distinguished from work performed in the usual manner from their regular headquarters.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and 4843-7 440