The Carrier has shown that under the applicable agreement between the parties to this dispute, the closing of Signal Station "ON" did not constitute a violation of the Agreement.
It is, therefore, respectfully submitted that the claim is without foundation and should be denied.
OPINION OF BOARD: Since there is no limitation thereon in the Agreement, there is no question but that the Carrier can properly discontinue a signal station and abolish the positions thereat provided that the work is abolished or transferred to other employes under the Agreement in the same seniority district. This claim is based upon the allegation that the work of telegraphers at signal station "ON" was transferred, after its discontinuance, to train service employes and to telegraphers at signal station "WD" in a different seniority district.
The Carrier admits liabality for a day's pay to a telegrapher on 76 tricks when train crews used the telephone at "ON" to contact the dispatcher. Careful review of the evidence leads to the conclusion that the Carrier violated the Agreement by permitting or directing other actions there.
Signal station "ON" was located at the junction of the single track West Shore Branch and a single connection to the Pennsylvania division. The switch is normally set for traffic passing to the Pennsylvania division. After the discontinuance of signal station "ON", train crews on through West Shore Branch trains were directed to and did use the telephone at "ON" to contact the operator at signal station "WD" to obtain permission to cross the switch and to report when the switch was in normal position after passing. It also appears that upon occasions, the operator at signal station "WD" reported such information to the Syracuse division dispatcher. We consider that, under our prior awards, such communications were work belonging to telegraphers holding seniority on the Syracuse division. Communications by train crews to telegraphers on another seniority district and by them with the dispatcher on the Syracuse seniority district were violations of the Agreement making the Carrier liable for a day's pay to a Syracuse division telegrapher on each trick during which such work was performed.
The Organization also maintained that throwing the hand switch at "ON" was work belonging under the Agreement because of its performance by the former telegraphers at "ON". The throwing of switches has never been considered to be work belonging exclusively to any one class or craft of railroad employes. The Agreement here involved recognizes that throwing switches is not normally the duty of a telegrapher by providing extra pay when they are required to do so.
We have heretofore held that we have no authority to direct the re-establishment of positions so that the Carrier may be free to adopt any arrangement within the rules of the Agreement to remove the violation. Meanwhile from September 20, 1949 until the violations stated herein are corrected, the Carrier is liable for one day's pay to a telgrapher holding seniority on the Syracuse division for each trick upon which such a violation occurred.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds: