NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Thomas C. Begley, Referee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS,
FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES
RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INC.
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the District Committee of the
Brotherhood that
(a) The Agreement governing hours of service and working
conditions between the Railway Express Agency and the Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express
8c Station Employes, effective September 1, 1949, was violated at
the New Orleans, Louisiana Agency in making a run-around on call
of W. C. Crochet, Chauffeur, to work his regular assignment May
30, 1951; and
(b) He shall now be compensated for 8 hours' pay at time
and
one-half rates
at the rate of $356.93 basic per month.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: W,
C. Crochet, with seniority
dating from April 22, 1941, is regularly assigned to position 156, group 91,
"Chauffeur;" hours of assignment 12:30 to 9:00 P. M., meal period 5:30 to 6:00
P. M., days of rest Saturday and Sunday, salary $256.94 basic per month.
L. J. Labatut, with seniority dating from December 15, 1942, is regularly
assigned to position 5, group 92, "Relief Chauffeur;" salary $256.93 basic per
month. His assignment operates as follows:
Monday and Tuesday: Relieve position 136, group 91, 12:30 to
9:00 P. M., meal period 6:00 to 6:30
P. M.
Wednesday and Thursday: Extra, 3:00 to 11:30 P. M., meal period
8:00 to 8:30 P. M.
Friday: Relieves position 66, group 91, 2:00 to
10:30 P. M., meal period 7:00 to 7:30
P. M.
Saturday and Sunday: Rest Days.
Crochet's position (156-91) is required to handle transfer traffic between
the several depots at New Orleans. In addition, a part of his regular assignment involves making pick-ups at the three warehouses of the Western
110451
6677-13
1057
in which the holiday occurred without loss of pay. That is what happened
in this case. If it had been necessary to work the employe on the holiday
the Carrier would have been obligated to call him under the specific provisions of Rule 55 and pay him at punitive rate. The right to make such
call is vested in the Carrier and the elnploye may not demand as a matter
of right to be called on the holiday. The claim in behalf of Chauffeur
Crochet is entirely without merit and should be denied.
All evidence and data have been considered by the parties.
(Exhibits not reproduced).
OPINION OF BOARD:
This claim states that the Agency made a run
around on call of W. C. Crochet, Chauffeur, to work his regular assignment
May 30, 1951, and asked compensation at time-and-one-half rates, at the
rate of $256.93 basic per month.
The Employes state that Crotchet's regular assignment required that
he handle the transfer traffic between the several depots at New Orleans
and, in addition, as part of his regular assignment, he made regular pickups at the three warehouses of the Western Electric Company.
May 30, 1951 was Decoration Day and the Claimant was notified that
May 30th being a holiday, he should not report for work.
The Claimant was regularly assigned to Position 156, Group 91 "Chaffeur", hours 12:30 to 9:00 P. M., meal period 5:30 to 6:00 P. M., days of rest
Saturday and Sunday, salary $256.93 per month.
L. J. Labatut is regularly assigned to Position 5, Group 92, "Relief
Chauffeur", salary $256.93 basic per month. His assignment operates as
follows:
Monday and Tuesday: Relief position 138, group 91, 12:30 to
9:00 P. M., meal period 6:00 to 6:30 P. M.
Wednesday and Thursday: Extra. 3:00 to 11:30 P. M., meal
period 8:00 to 8:30 P. M.
Friday: Relieves position 66, group 91, 2:00 to 10:30 P. M., meal
period. 7:00 to 7:30 P. M.
Saturday and Sunday: Rest days.
Labatut was notified that he should not report for work on May 30, 1951.
Agency contends that there was work for Relief Chauffeur Labatut on
his regular assignment May 30th; that he was called and that as part of
the work that day he made pick-ups at all of the three warehouses of the
Western Electric Company. The Agency states, and it is not denied by the
employes, that on Wednesday Labatut's assignment included unexpected
calls at the Western Electric plants.
t Decision No. 2 of the 40-Hour Week Committee does not apply to this
Agency because it was not a party to the committee hearings and the interpretation given by that Committee to Rule 45-A (j) is not binding upon
the Agency or the Organization.
The Organization has shown that Labatut performed some work that the
Claimant performed as part of his regular tour of duty, on May 30, but has
failed to show that it was work that the Claimant had a preferential right
to perform. Therefore, this claim must be denied.
6077-14
1058
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving
the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agency did not violate the Agreement.
AWARD
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST: (Sgd.) A. Ivan Tummon
Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 6th day of February, 1953.