NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the District Committee of the Brotherhood that:
OPINION OF BOARD: Evidence that the automobile operated by claimant struck the rear end of another automobile which had stopped for a red signal is a proper basis for upholding a charge of careless operation of a Company vehicle. Thus the request to clear claimant's record of that charge is without merit.
With respect to the claim for reparation it is noted that the Company, by its letters of March 6, 1952 and April 1, 1952, offered to restore claimant to his position without reparations providing physical examination under Rule 98 disclosed that he was competent to operate a Company owned motor vehicle. The General Chairman's letter of April 4, 1952 which accepted the proposal for a physical examination without any reservation on the subject of reparations must be considered as an acceptance of the offer made by the Company. Hence the claim for reparation is without merit.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;