Award No. 6484
Docket No. CL-6506
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Emmett Ferguaon, Referee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS,
FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committe of the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station
Employes on the Missouri Pacific Railroad, that the Carrier violated the
Clerks' Agreement:
1. When on July 9, 1952, it nominally abolished the position
of Bill Clerk, rate $14.26 per day, at Conway, Arkansas, and removed
the clerical work comprising the essence and substance of the regularly assigned duties of the position out from under the scope and
operation of the Agreement and utilized a Station Agent, an employe
of another craft to perform said work, in violation of Scope Rule 1,
Definition Rule 2 and other related rules of the Clerks' Agreement;
2. The Carrier be directed by appropriate Board Order to reimburse claimants Clerks F. M. Heaton and W. F. Mullings, for wage
loss suffered due to the Carrier's action in violation of the Agreement
as shown in "Claim Statement" attached hereto and made a part
hereof, which claims are continuing until the violation of Agreement
is removed and the claims satisfied.
CLAIM STATEMENT
Basis and
Seniority Amount of Explanation
Name Date Claim Dates Claim of Claim
F. M. Heaton "B" 10/28/41 July 9-10-11-14-15- Account Bill Clerk
"A" 6/ 6/42 16-17-18-21-22-23- job, Conway, rate
24-25-28-29-30-31 $14.26 abolished,
(at Russellville, 17 days @ 44 day $8.16 claimant exercised
Check Clerk) seniority to position
Aug. 1-4-5-6-7-8- of Check Clerk at
11-12-13-14-15 Russellville, Ark.,
11 days @ 480 day 5.28 $13.78 per day, or net
wage loss of 48¢ per
$13.44 day.
[1064]
6484-2
1065
Basis and
Seniority
Amount of Explanation
Name Date Claim Dates
Claim of Claim
W. F. Mullings "A" 9/10/42 July 28-29-30-31 Account displaced by
4 days p 300 day $1.20 Heaton due to abol
ishment of Bill Clerk
Aug. 1-4-5-6-7-8- job, Conway, Mullings
11-12-13-14-15-18- exercised seniority to
19-20-21-22-25-26- Relief Clerk position
27-28-29 (Pool 5) at Ft. Smith
21 days p 300 day 6.30 (Yard Clerk) rate
$13.48 per day, net
wage loss 300 per day.
Sept. 2-3-4-5 Account effective
4 days ® $1.80 day 7.20 Sept. 1, 1952, rate of
relief job on Baggage-
$14.20 man went to rate of
job of $11.98 per day
-difference in $13.78
and $11.98-$1.80 per
day, for four days
$7.20.
Claimant Mullings' claim is continuing each work day until dispute is
disposed of.
NOTE: Copy of Superintendent's notice of July 7 to Clerk
Mullings is attached hereto, also Superintendent's notice dated July
17, 1952 to Clerk Cox re Mullings going to Ft. Smith; also Superintendent's notice to Cox that Mullings was going to work Monday,
July 28, 1952 at Ft. Smith.
There were other employes adversely affected as check of payroll will
reveal, such as Clerk L. D. Houchins, George Arning, O. J. Smith, W. R.
Biggerstaff, R. L. Urquhart, who were displaced and suffered wage loss.
Clerk L. D. Houchins left the service on September 10, 1952.
COPY
Coffeyville, July 7, 1952
Mr. W. F. Mullings, Russellville, Ark.,
Mr. E. A. Jacobs, Russellville, Ark.
Account position of Bill Clerk at Conway, Ark. abolished, Mr.
F. M. Heaton, Jr. has given notice of his desire to exercise seniority
to position of 3:00 A. M. Check Clerk at Russellville, Ark., displacing
Mr. W. F. Mullings, effective 3:00 A. M., July 9, 1952.
This exercise of seniority is hereby authorized.
Mr. Mullings' attention is called to provisions of Rule 14D, which
requires filing of name and address to protect seniority rights.
(Signed) C. L. Christy
cc: CCM-FMA PR-WFM
6484-3
1066
COPY Coffeyville, July 17, 1952
R-2953
Mr. M. W. Cox, Ft. Smith, Ark.,
Mr. B. C. Burkert, Ft. Smith, Ark.
Account displaced as check clerk at Russellville, Mr. W. F. Mullings has given notice of his desire to exercise seniority to position
of Rest Day Relief Clerk (pool 5) at Ft. Smith, displacing Mr.
M. W. Cox.
This exercise of seniority is hereby authorized.
Mr. Mullings will advise later when he will assume duties of the
position, as he desires to break in on it.
(Signed) C. L. Christy
cc: CCM-WFM PR-MWC
COPY Coffeyville,
July 25, 1952
R-2953
M. W. Cox, Ft. Smith, Ark.
B. C. Burkert, Ft. Smith, Ark.
Supplementing my letter July 17, 1952, relative W. F. Mullings
displacing M. W. Cox:
Mr, Mailings will assume duty at 5:00 A. M., Monday, July 28,
1952.
(Signed) C. L. Christy
cc: CCM-WFM PR-MWC
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Prior to April 2, 1952, the
Freight Office force subject to the scope of the Clerks' Agreement at Conway,
Arkansas, located opposite but across some six tracks from the Passenger
Station where the Telegraphers work, was-
Position Rate Assigned Hours Assigned Days Rest Days
1PM-5PM Mon. through Fri. Sat. and Sun.
Bill Clerk 14.18 10:30AM-2:30PM;
- 3:30PM-7:30PM Mon. through Fri. Sat. and Sun.
Check Clerk 13.70 7AM-11:30AM;
12:30PM-4PM Mon. through Fri. Sat. and Sun.
Trucker 1.47 hr. 8AM-12N;
IPM-5PM Mon. through Fri. Sat. and Sun.
Also there was a station force at Conway subject to the scope and operation
of the Agreement of the Order of Railroad Telegraphers, consisting of-
Telegrapher- 7:59AM- 3:59PM
Telegrapher- 3:59PM-11:59PM
Telegrapher- 11:59PM- 7:59AM,
and a Station Agent, which is designated as a Star Agency position, rated
at $406.80 per month as of February 1, 1951, with no assigned hours. Subsequent rate changes, if any, in so far as this Agent is concerned, are not
shown here.
6484-30
10,93
There also appears in the "Opinion" of Award 2071 the following
paragraph:
"The Board cannot say that because the Agent at Wynne was
under the telegraphers agreement, the clerical work could be assigned to him; but, it could not be assigned him if he were not under
the telegraphers' agreement. Logically, there could be no distinction."
We hold that there can be and there is a distinction-and that it is a
logical distinction. The distinction is that station clerical work is within the
scope of the Telegraphers' Agreement as well as the Clerks' Agreement-it
was under the Telegraphers' Agreement first and has continued to be thereunder since the first agreement was made. There certainly would be a difference between giving this work to an employe under the Telegraphers'
Agreement and to one who is not. But your Board has gone farther than that
in the flow and ebb awards which hold that it is not a violation of the
Clerks' Agreement to have clerical work incidental to any employe's position
performed by such employe whether he is covered by another agreement or
not. Every item of work involved in the instant dispute is certainly incidental
to the duties of the Agent; he was in charge of everyone of them even when
they were being performed by clerks, they are part of the reason why we
have an agent at Conway.
In the case covered by Award 4197 the Agent performed some of the
duties of an established clerks' position while the incumbent was absent
during his meal period. obviously, the distinguishable facts eliminate any
application of that awad to the instant dispute.
(Exhibits not reproduced),
OPINION OF BOARD:
This claim is opposed by the carrier on the first
ground that no notice of the hearings of this division has been given a third
party "involved" in the claim.
Section 3 First (j) of the Railway Labor Act iequires
" * * * the several divisions of the Adjustment Board shall give
due notice of all hearings to the employe or employes and the carrier or carriers involved in any dispute submitted to them."
The question presented is identical with that raised and decided in Award
No. 6482. The same reasoning, opinion, findings and award expressed therein
are repeated and re-stated as our opinion in the present docket.
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving
the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds;
That the parties to this dispute, the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks and Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, attended an oral hearing
thereon on March 10, 1953;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has no jurisdiction over the
persons involved herein who have not been given notice of the hearing,
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction by law over
all the classes of employes and the dispute involved herein.
That the claim should be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction over the persons not notified.
6484-31
1.094
AWARD
Claim dismissed without prejudice and in accordance with the Opinion
and Findings.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST: (Sgd.) A. Ivan Tummon
Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 11th day of February, 1954.