NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Dudley E. Whiting, Referee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS
THE NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
(Line West of Buffalo)
Case No. I
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committtee of The
Order of Railroad Telegraphers on The New York Central Railroad (Line
West of Buffalo) that:
1. Carrier violated the Agreement between the parties when it
failed and refused to pay E. R. Andrews at the rate of time and
one-half for eight (8) hours' service performed on the 21st of
September, 1952, at "BK", Corning, Ohio.
2. Carrier shall now compensate E. R. Andrews for the difference
between the straight time paid and the time and one-half rate
for services performed as aforesaid.
3. Carrier further violated the Agreement, when on the 21st of
September, 1952, it failed to use extra employe H. S. Hunt
to perform rest day relief services at "BK", Corning, Ohio, on
the first shift instead of E. R. Andrews.
4. Carrier shall now compensate H. S. Hunt at the straight time
rate for eight hours on September 21, 1952.
Case No. 2
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of The
Order of Railroad Telegraphers on The New York Central Railroad (Line
West of Buffalo) that:
1. Carrier violated the Agreement between the parties when it
failed and refused to pay J. A. Evans at the rate of time and
one-half for eight (8) hours' service performed on the 2nd and
3rd days of August, 1952, at Point Pleasant, Ohio.
2. Carrier shall now compensate J. A. Evans for the difference
between the straight time paid and the time and one-half rate
for services performed as aforesaid.
[1202)
6977-2
1203
3. Carrier further violated the Agreement, when on the 2nd and
3rd days of August, 1952 it failed to use extra employe J. E.
Simpson to perform rest day relief service at Point Pleasant,
Ohio, on the first shift, instead of J. A. Evans.
4. Carrier shall now compensate J. E. Simpson at the straight
time rate for eight hours on August 2 and 3, 1952.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Case
No. 1.
E. R. Andrews is regularly assigned to Relief No. 21, programmed to work as follows: first shift "BK",
Corning, Ohio, Sunday and Monday; second shift "BK" Tuesday and Wednesday; third shit "BK Thursday. His rest days are Friday and Saturday.
Claimant Andrews by his own request was assigned to a temporary vacancy relieving the Agent-Operator, E. S. Bingham, at Glouster, Ohio, beginning September 8, 1952. The Agent-Operator at Glouster had a work week
beginning Monday, Saturday and Sunday being the assigned rest days. Andrews
filled that position September 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19, 1952,
while the regular man, E. S. Bingham was on vacation. Mr. Andrews was
off on the rest days September 13, 14 and 20, 1952. The Carrier required
or permitted Andrews to return to Relief Assignment No. 21 and work on
Sunday, September 21, 1952, the second rest day of his assigned work week
which began or. Monday, September 15. Mr. H. S. Hunt was the senior idle
extra employe who had not worked forty hours in this work-week and was
available and entitled to work Relief Assignment No. 21 on September 21,
1952, first shift "BK".
The following is a graphic account in chronological order of the temporary
vacancies and employes here involved:
Regular Owner: E. S. Bingham Regular Owner: E. R. Andrews
Agent Operator Regular Relief
Glouster, Ohio Assignment No.
21
Temporary Vacancies
Agent-Operator Assignment Regular Relief Assignment No. 21
Glouster, Ohio
September 1952
Temporarily filled by: Temporarily filled by:
Monday Sept. 8 E. R. Andrews
Tuesday Sept. 9 E. R. Andrews R. A. Hines (2nd "BK")
Wednesday Sept. 10 E. R. Andrews R. A. Hines (2nd "BK")
Thursday Sept: 11 E. R. Andrews R. A. Hines (3rd "BK")
Friday Sept . 12 E. R. Andrews (Rest Day)
Saturday Sept. 13 (Rest Day) (Rest Day)
Sunday Sept. 14 (Rest Day) R. A. Hines (1st "BK")
Monday Sept. 15 E. R. Andrews R. A. Hines (2nd "BK")
Tuesday Sept. 16 E. R. Andrews R. A. Hines (2nd "BK")
Wednesday Sept. 17 E. R. Andrews R. A. Hines (2nd "BK")
Thursday Sept. 18 E. R. Andrews H. S. Hunt (3rd "BK")
Friday Sept. 19 E. R. Andrews (Rest Day)
Saturday Sept. 20 (Rest Day) (Rest Day)
Sunday Sept. 21 (Rest Day) E. R. Andrews (1st "BK )
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Case
No.
2. J. A. Evans is
regularly assigned to rest day relief No. 8, programmed to work as follows:
first shift Point Pleasant, Ohio, Saturday and Sunday; second shift Point
Pleasant, Monday and Tuesday; third shift Point Pleasant, Wednesday. The
rest days are Thursday and Friday.
6977-25
1
226
assignment followed claimant then he should have worked big regular
assignment on November 23, 24 and on November 30 and December
1, 1950. This, we think, was neither the intent nor purpose of the
rules as written. (Empasis added)
In view of what we have said we find the claim to be without
merit."
Board Awards such as those cited here, particularly the underscored portions of the quoted excerpts, definitely support the carrier's position that
there is no merit whatsoever in the claims of regular Operator J. A. Evans
and regular Relief Operator E. R. Andrews.
SUMMARY
The carrier has conclusively shown that:-
1. No Agreement rule was violated;
2. The provisions of the rules cited by the Organization lend no
support whatever to the claims in this docket;
3. There is no Agreement rule or understanding which prohibits
or restricts a regular employe from returning to his own regular
assignment and resuming work thereon on the day after he
works a temporary vacancy which terminated;
4. The temporary vacancy on the Monday-through-Friday assignment at Pt. Pleasant (Case No. 2) terminated Friday, August
1, 1952;
5. The two days, Saturday, August 2, and Sunday, August 3,
1952, for which claims are made in Case No. 2, were the 1st
and 2nd days of Relief Operator Evans' Saturday-throughWednesday work week and were worked by him;
6. The temporary vacancy as Agent-Operator at Glouster terminated Friday, September 19, 1952;
7. The one day, Sunday, September 21 1952, for which claims
are made in Case No. 1, was the first day of Relief Operator
Andrews' Sunday-through-Thursday work week and was worked
by him;
8. Claims on behalf of Extra Operators (Hunt, Case No. 1 and
Simpson, Case No. 2) under Article 21 have no status because
there was no extra work to be performed on the days for which
claims are made and Article 21, therefore, is not applicable;
9. Agreement rules uphold the carrier's position;
10. National Railroad Adjustment Board Awards support the position of the carrier;
11. The claims in this docket are not valid under existing rules,
are based on untenable nremises and should be denied.
All evidence and data set forth in this submission have been considered
by the parties in conference.
(Exhibits not Reproduced.)
OPINION OF BOARD:
Except for names, dates and places the facts
here are the same as those in our Award No. 6976, so that award governs
the disposition of this claim.
6977-26
1227
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving
the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and uon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
The Agreement was violated.
AWARD
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST: (Sgd.) A. Ivan Tummon
Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 26th day of
May, 1955.