NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

THIRD DIVISION




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES




STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes on the Missouri Pacific Railroad that the Carrier violated the Clerks' Agreement:




EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Auditor Freight Receipts Office of the Missouri Pacific General Offices Accounting Department is one seniority district and roster of Class "A" and "B" employes and a Machine Operators' separate seniority district and roster as provided for in Rule 5, page 26 of the Clerks' Agreement and it consists of several sub-divisions, such as Recheck Division, Interline Division, Revising Division, Government Division, Transit Division, Local Division, Company Material Division, Statistical Division, Missouri-Illinois Division, Station Relief Claims (Adjustment Division), et cetera, and miscellaneous clerical positions not attaching to any specific sub-division.


There are approximately 290 employes in the Auditor Freignt Receipts Office subject to the scope and operation of the Clerks' Agreement.


The Recheck Division located on the Sixth Floor of the Missouri Pacific General Office Building consists of a Supervisor and Assistant Supervisor, both subject to the provisions of the Clerks' Agreement (the Supervisor is restricted from the seniority rules of the Agreement) and approximately 42 Recheck Clerks, rate $16.54 per day, and other clerical positions of miscellaneous classification, all of whom are subject to the provisions of the Clerks' Agreement.



7091-23 90

OPINION OF BOARD: This claim is based upon Rule 25 (b) which governs the use of employes for overtime work and provides for the use of senior qualified employes performing work of certain nature or class. The Carrier used a junior employe of the same classification as claimant and Carrier's chief accounting officer explained the reason as follows:



It is clear from that statement that the Carrier selected the most qualified employes instead of the senior qualified employes as required by the rule. Since there is no doubt on this record that claimant was qualified to do the work required and was senior to the employes used, it appears that the Carrier violated the applicable rule.


In accordance with our prior awards the claim will be sustained at the pro-rata rate.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21,1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and






    Claim sustained at pro-rata rate.


                NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of Third Division


ATTEST: (Sgd.) A. Ivan Tummon
Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 29th day of July, 1955.