ASSIGNED REST ASSIGNED
POSITION NUMBER HOURS DAYS TO
Ticket Agent Telegrapher 7:OOA to 4:OOP Sat-Sun. J. Ward
Ticket Clerk 79-1-529 9:OOA to 6:OOP Sat-Sun. R. W. Thompson
Ticket Clerk 79-1-531 9:OOP to 6:OOA Tues-Wed. H. Kaufman
Baggage Checkman 79-2-533 9:OOP to 6:OOA Sat-Sun. C. A. Nungester
Baggage Checkman 79-2-534 9:30A to 6:30P Sat-Sun. T. G. Thornburu
Mail Trucker 9:30A to 6:30P Sun-Mon. C. J. Sthrol
Trucker 6:45P to 3:45A Tues-Wed. E. C. Heinmaa
Trucker 11:OOP to S:OOA Mon-Tues. R. S. Stover
Trucker 9:OOP to 6:OOA Wed-Thurs. Ed. Mitchell
Trucker 9:OOP to 6:OOA Sun-Mon. J. E. Sterling
Relief Clerk 79-1-532 Various Thurs-Fri. V. W. Derryberry
Sat-Sun. -Ticket Clerk 79-1-529
Monday -Mail Trucker 9:30A to 6:30P
Tues-Wed. -Ticket Clerk 79-1-531


7286-19 19

    (5) The principle of "ebb and flow" is expressly implied in the working contract.


    (6) There is substantial evidence that both parties are in agreement as to the application of this principle under the operation of the working contract.


    (7) The propriety of giving clerical employes a three-hour call is implicit in the working rules.


Based on all that has been said hereinabove, the Carrier submits the claim made here at Parts (a) and (b) and (c) is completely without merit. The Carrier respectfully requests this Division to find this claim as being without merit and to deny it accordingly.


In accordance with the requirements contained in this Division's Circular 1 issued October 10, 1934, the Carrier submits that all data in support of the Carriers position in this case has been presented to, or is known by, the other party to this dispute.


    (Exhibits not reproduced.)


OPINION OF BOARD: The claim here presented is the same situation on an interpretation of the same rules of the same Agreement between these parties as considered in Award 7285.


However, from this record the use of the Call Rule 8 in the Agreement as applied to (b) of the claim is not clear and we are of the opinion that this part of the claim should be remanded for further consideration on the property.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the .parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and


Carrier violated the Agreement as the Claims (a) and (c). Claim (b) to be remanded.


                  AWARD


Claims (a) and (c) sustained. Claim (b) remanded in accordance with Opinion and Finding.


                NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of Third Division


ATTEST: (Sgd.) A. Ivan Tummon
Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 26th day of March, 1956.