THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS
NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of The Order of Railroad Telegraphers on the Northwestern Pacific Railroad, that:
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: There is in evidence an agreement between the parties bearing a date of August 1, 1945 (reprinted September 1 1951, including revisions). A copy of this agreement is on file with the Board and is hereby made a part of this dispute.
Alderpoint California, is a one-man agency located at M. P. 209 on the South Fork Subdivision. he occupant of this position is also joint agent for the Railway Express Company. The assigned hours of the agentbtelegrapher are 7:59 A. M. to 3:59 P. M. with one hour off for meal, Monday through Friday; rest days are Saturday and Sunday. The station is considered closed on the rest days, although claimant has been called out to work on Saturdays to handle business at his station.
Passenger train No. 3 is due Alderpoint 9:38 P. M. daily. This train has baggage, express, U. S. mail, milk and cream to load or unload daily
Rule 1, the Scope Rule, specifies the classifications of employes who come within the scope of the agreement. That rule does not contain any reference to work or the specific duties that may be required of the respective classes of employes named thereunder. Clearly, therefore, it cannot be said to support the claim in this Docket.
Rule 2 merely provides the basis for compensation, i. e., hourly-rated and monthly-rated positions for service performed by emloyes coming within the Scope of the Agreement and also provides the manner in which claims for compensatoin will be presented and handled.
Rule 6 provides for the payment of a two-hour call under the conditions provided in the rule.
Rule 14 deals with seniority of employes coming within the Scope of the Agreement.
It is obvious that none of the rules cited by petitioner's general chairman provides any basis for the claim here presented As a matter of fact in presenting this case to the Board, the petitioner is endeavoring to unnecessarily enlarge upon the work of employes covered by the Telegraphers' Agreement in the absence of any provision in the agreement supporting its position contrary to practices both generally and at the particular point here involved throughout the life of the current and prior agreements.
The carrier asserts it has conclusively established that the claim in this docket is without basis or merit and, therefore, requests that said claim, if not dismissed, be denied.
All data herein submitted have been presented to the duly authorized representative of the employes and are made a part of the particular question in dispute.
OPINION OF BOARD: Except for two relatively short periods, Alderpoint, California, has always been a one-man (Agent-Telegrapher) station. The Claim herein is that the Carrier violated the Parties Agreement when it required or permitted train crews to handle so-called "head-end" work and LCL freight between the train and warehouse at Alderpoint when the AgentTelegrapher was not on duty; the Claim is that the Agent-Telegrapher should have been "called" for such work and that he should now be paid a "call" for each day involved in the case. The record indicates that neither of the passenger trains which the Carrier operates through Alderpoint has ever been scheduled to arrive at that station during the Agent-Telegrapher's assigned hours and that the Agent-Telegrapher at Alderpoint never handled "head-end" work. The Record also indicates that at this station freight crews normally handled LCL freight, though the Agent-Telegrapher, when on duty, at times assisted them in such work. These facts considered, it must be concluded that the Claim of the Agent-Telegrapher at Alderpoint to the exclusive right to perform the work involved herein must be denied.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934; 8044-26 79