PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS,

FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES


THE DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA AND WESTERN RAILROAD

COMPANY


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that the Carrier violated and continues to violate the Clerks' Agreement:



EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Carrier maintains a Freight Station at Portland, Pa., and on the date prior to the improper abolition of the clerical position held by Harry Bellis, the relevant forces consisted of the following:




The Agent and Clerk-Operator positions are covered by the Telegraphers' Agreement, the clerical position by the Clerks' Agreement.

On June 5, 1954 the clerical position, which falls within the confines of the Clerks' Agreement was discontinued and the following duties which were attached thereto, were improperly allocated to the Clerk-Operator, as follows:


&063-10 339

    assignment. See Awards 4288, 4355 and 4477 of this Division. As stated in Award 4477:


      `When the work of clerks exceeds that which the telegrapher can perform and it becomes necessary to increase forces. the excess clerical work belongs to clerks and must be assigned to them. If the work recedes to the point where the telegraphers can perform it all, it is the clerks and not the telegraphers which must be cut off when telegraphic work remains to be performed.' "


    Award No. 4559, Third Division


The kind of work in question here has been performed by telegraphers for as long as we have had agreements with that Organization on this property. Work being performed by the telegrapher is incident to his telegraphic work. It has been recognized for many years that, with well understood limitations, the employe covered by the Telegraphers' Agreement may perform station work in conjunction with their exclusive telegrapher's work and, likewise, clerical employes may perform certain types of station work but under no circumstances or conditions, or at no time has either had the exclusive right or monopoly in the performance of such work. The telegrapher in this case is available to perform, and may perform, this work in connection with his telegraphic duties.


There is no rule, precedent or practice to support the employes' position in this claim which should be denied. All data in connection with this case have been handled with the employes on the property.


    (Exhibits not reproduced).


OPINION OF BOARD: Effective June 5, 1954, the Carrier discontinued a clerical position covered by the Clerks' Agreement, at the Portland Pa., Freight Station, and assigned the clerical duties formerly performed by the Clerk to the Cerk-Operator, covered by the Telegraphers' Agreement.


Prior to this action, there had been three positions at the Portland Freight Station: Agent-Operator, who performed all the work during the daytime, 7:00 A. M. to 3:00 P. .; and a Clerk and a Clerk-Operator who worked the night shift together, the former from 7:00 P. M. to 3:00 A. M. and the latter from 7 :30 P. M. to 3:30 A. M.


The work at Portland having decreased to the point where one man could perform it on the night shift, the Carrier abolished the clerical position. The Brotherhood's contention is that in assigning the clerical work of the abolished position to the Clerk-Operator, the Carrier violated the Scope Rule of the Agreement, the Seniority Rules, etc.


These contentions have been decided adversely to the Brotherhood in so many decisions of this Board that it would serve no useful purpose to replow this well plowed ground. See Awards 615, 2334 6269, and 6758

The general principles applied in these and similar awards have been held not applicable to certain situations, such as those covered by Awards 636, 4932, 2071, 2550, 7622, 4288, and others, but we find that the facts of the instant case bring it within the general rule rather than within the principles of the exceptional cases. The work of the Clerk-Operator, after the abolition of the Clerks position, was in proximity to his post.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

8063-11 340

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

    The Carrier did not violate the Agreement.


                AWARD


    Claim denied.


              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of THIRD DIVISION


              ATTEST: A. Ivan Tummon

              Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 20th day of September, 1957.