NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS
GULF, COLORADO AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of The
order of Railroad Telegraphers on The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway
System, that:
1. Carrier violated the Agreement when, beginning September
1, 1949, it required a combination of the work of the agent-telegrapher with the work of the telegrapher-clerk position at Center,
Texas, on Saturday; and
2. Carrier further violated the Agreement when, beginning
concurrently with the violation described in Item 1, it required a combination of the work of the position of telegrapher-clerk with the
work of the position of agent-telegrapher at Center, Texas, on
Mondays.
3. Carrier shall pay the senior idle extra telegrapher on the
district involved an amount equivalent to eight (8) hours at the
straight time rate for each Saturday, beginning September 3, 1949,
when it required the telegrapher-clerk at Center, Texas, to perform the work, and act as rest day relief employe in filling the position of agent-elegrapher at that point. If there be no such idle
extra telegrapher on any of the Saturdays involved, then the Carrier
shall pay the regular occupant of the agent-telegrapher position, an
amount equivalent to eight (8) hours at the time and one-half rate
because he was not used to perform the work and fill his position on
each Saturday, his rest day, beginning as aforesaid.
4, Carrier shall pay the senior idle extra telegrapher on the
district involved, an amount equivalent to eight (8) hours at the
straight time rate for each Monday, beginning September 5, 1949,
when it required the agent-telegrapher at Center, Texas, to perform
the work and act as rest day relief employe in filling the position
of telegrapher-clerk at that point. Tf there be no such idle telegrapher on any of the Mondays involved, then the Carrier shall pay
the regular occupant of the telegrapher-clerk position an amount
the equivalent of eight (8) hours at the time and one-half rate because he was not used to perform the work and fill his position on
each Monday, his rest day, beginning as aforesaid.
(2521
8138-is
299
support under the Agreement rules, the Carrier further asserts that the
Employes' claim for eight (8) hours at penalty time and one-half rates in
behalf of (1) the agent-telegrapher on Saturdays and (2) the telegrapherclerk on Mondays account not used on such days is contrary to the wellestablished principle consistently recognized and adhered to by the Board
that the right to work is not the equivalent of work performed under the
overtime and call rules of an Agreement. See Awards 4244, 4645, 4728,
4815, 5195, 5437, 5764 5929, 5967 and many others.
Also without prejudice to its position that the Employes' claim in the
instant dispute is entirely without support under the Agreement rules and
should be denied for the reasons previously expressed herein, the Carrier
further asserts that the Employes' claim for eight (8) hours at the time and
one-half rate in behalf of the agent-telegrapher at Center on Saturdays,
beginning September 3, 1949, and for eight (8) hours at the time and onehalf rate in behalf of the telegrapher-clerk at Center on Mondays, beginning
September 5 1949, is improper for the reason that the claim was first presented to the Carrier by the Local Chairman in letter dated January 9,
1950, which is quoted in the Carrier's Statement of Facts, and the retroactive penalties are therefore necessarily limited by the provisions of the
last
sentence of
Article V(i) of the Telegraphers' Agreement, effective
December 1, 1938 and similar rule appearing as Article V, Section 10 of the
current Agreement, both of which read as follows:
"Grievances, other than appeals on time claims or discipline
not presented within sixty (60) days from date alleged to have
occurred, are barred from consideration. Time claims must be
presented in writing to the Railway Company to be entitled to
consideration, and
any payment claimed will, if allowed, be restricted to a period
commencing not
earlier than thirty (30) days
prior to date so presented."
The Carrier also fully explained in its Statement of Facts that, due to a
substantial decrease in business, it was possible to close the station at Center
each Saturday, in addition to Sunday, and assign both the agent-telegrapher
and the telegrapher-clerk to work Monday through Friday each week with
Saturday and Sunday rest days, effective July 8, 1950. In other words,
commencing July 8, 1950, there were service, duties, or operations to be
performed at Center only five days per week-Monday through Friday.
Since the staggered work week assignments complained of were discontinued
on that date, the time element involved in this dispute is automatically Testricted to te period from December 10, 1949 to July 7, 1950, inclusive.
x ~ x r
In conclusion, the Carrier respectfully reasserts that the claim of the
Employes in the instant dispute is entirely without merit or support under
the Agreement rules and should be denied in its entirety.
All that is contained herein is either known or available to the Employes
or their representatives.
(Exhibits not reproduced.)
OPINION OF BOARD:
This case is a companion case to that involved
in Award 8136. The Agent-Telegrapher and the Telegrapher-Clerk involved
herein are both covered by the Telegrapher Agreement and hold common
seniority in the same seniority district. For the reasons stated in the aforementioned Award, the Claim herein must be denied.
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving
the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
8138-49
300
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Carrier did not violate the Agreement.
AWARD
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of THIRD DIVISION
ATTEST: A. Ivan Tummon
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of November, 1957.