PARTIES TO DISPUTE:



STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of The Order of Railroad Telegraphers on the Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad (Southern Region), that:















EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Agreements between the parties to this dispute are on file with this Division of the National Railroad Adjustment Board and by reference thereto are made a part of this submission.


Disputes covering each of the three claimants named were instituted and handled on the property in strict accordance with defined procedure and are now appealed to this Board and Division under that procedure.


All claimants were regularly assigned to the extra board on February 22, 1955, the claimed date.


Each claimant received compensation on the day preceding and following the Holiday.





8371-15 349

employe. Not only does such employe have to be an assigned employe but, as the agreement provides, he must, in addition, be a regularly assigned employe. An extra employe does not have a regu:ar assignment-he works only when work is available. There can be no doubt that the entire basis for the holiday payment was so that regularly assigned employes could maintain their "usual take-home pay". This is the only group of employes that have "usual take-home pay".


Obviously, had the parties intended that holiday payment would be made to extra employes, they would have so stipulated. Had the parties intended that Article II, Section 1 refer to both regularly assigned and extra employes the agreement would contain such an intention.


The only result from the Petitioner's position in this case would be to stirke the words "regularly assigned" from Article II, Section 1, or to incorporate in the article the words "extra employe", which are not there now.


This Board has many times held that its duty is to construe the agreement, as written, and that the Board is without authority to rewrite the agrement. See Awards 6959, 6912, 6833, 6828, 6757, 6365 and others.




OPINION OF BOARD: Decision on this case must turn on the fact that none of the claimants here was, on February 22, 1955, a holiday, "regularly assigned", within the meaning of Article 11, Section 1 of the August 21, 1954 National Agreement as already interpreted by along line of decisions of this Division. Awards 7978, 7979, 7980, 7982, 8053, 8054, 8055, 8056 and 8058.




FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and






    Claim denied.

              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

              By Order of THIRD DIVISION


              ATTEST: A. Ivan Tummon

              Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 13th day of June, 1958.