NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS,
FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
CASE NO. 1
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that-
(a) Carrier violated the Clerks' Agreement at the Ticket Office,
Central Station, Memphis, Tennessee, when on March 8, 1956 it
unilaterally assigned work theretofore attaching a clerical position
to be performed by an employe of the Carrier occupying a position
not included within the Scope Rule of its Agreement with the Brotherhood, revised as of February 1, 1954.
(b) S. H. Holt be compensated the difference between what he
was paid on his assigned ticket clerk position and the rate of pay
attaching the accountant position on March 8, 1956.
CASE NO. 2
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that-
(a) Carrier violated the Clerks' Agreement at the Local Freight
Agent's Office, Memphis, Tennessee, when on April 10, 11, 12 and 13,
1956 it unilaterally assigned work theretofore attaching a clerical
position to be performed by an employe occupying a position not included within the Scope Rule of its Agreement with the Brotherhood,
revised as of February 1, 1954.
(b) M. G. Burks be compensated the difference between what
he was paid on his regularly assigned position and the rate of pay
attaching the chief clerk position on dates enumerated in Claim (a)
above.
[9421
8791-2
843
CASE NO. 3
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that-
(a) Carrier violated the Clerks' Agreement at the Local Freight
Agent's Office, Memphis, Tennessee, when on August 25, 1956 it unilaterally assigned work theretofore attaching a clerical position to
be performed by an employe of the Carrier occupying a position not
included within the Scope Rule of its Agreement with the Brotherhood, revised as of February 1, 1954.
(b) E. J. O'Hara be compensated for wage losses sustained
representing a day's pay at the rate attaching the chief clerk position
on August 25, 1956.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving
the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon and upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the carrier and the employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein;
That this Division was certified to the Third Division of the Adjustment
Board ex parte by the complainant party; and
That hearing thereon was waived by the parties and under date of April
6, 1959 the complainant party addressed a formal communication to the
Secretary of the Third Division requesting withdrawal of this case from
further consideration by the Division, which request is hereby granted.
AWARD
Case dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of THIRD DIVISION
ATTEST: A. Ivan Tummon
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of April, 1959.