NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY-Gulf District
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the General Committee of The
Order of Railroad Telegraphers on the Missouri Pacific Railroad (Gulf
District), that:
CASE NO. 1
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto when
on the 24th day of April 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
record by the use of the ,telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate L, L. Davis for
eight hours at the pro rata rate account of such violation.
CASE NO. 2
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 25th day of April 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
record by the use of the telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall compensate T. M. Manning for eight hours
at pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO. 3
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto when
on the 29th day of April 1958 it caused, required or permitted Extra
Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of record by
use of the telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall compensate H. W. Thornton for eight hours at
pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO. 4
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 30th day of April 1958 it caused, required or permitted
[8037
8884-2
g0¢
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
record by use of telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall compensate L. L. Davis for eight hours at the
pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO. S
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 1st day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
record by use of the telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate L. L. Davis for
eight hours at the pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO. 6
1. Carrier violated the Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 5th day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of record by use of the telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate L. L. Davis for
eight hours at pro rata rate for such violation.
CASE NO. 7
1. Carrier violated the Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 6th day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
of record by use of the telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate H. M. Thornton for
eight hours at pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO.
8
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 7th day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
record by use of the telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate L. L. Davis for
eight hours at pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO. 9
1. Carrier violated the Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 8th day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
record by use of the telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate L, L. Davis for
eight hours at pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO. 10
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 9th day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted
8884-3
805
Extra Gang Foreman L. T, Lynch to transmit communication of
record by the use of the .telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall compensate T. M. Manning for eight hours at
pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO. 11
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 12th day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T, Lynch to transmit communication of
record by the use of the telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate H. M, Thornton
for eight hours at pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO. 12
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 13th day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
record by the use of the telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate H. M. Thornton
for eight hours at pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO. 13
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 14th day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
record by the use of the telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall compensate L. L. Davis for eight hours at the
pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO. 14
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 16th day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
record by the use of the .telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate T. Manning for
eight hours at pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO. 15
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 19th day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
record by the use of the telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate H. M, Thornton
for eight hours at pro rata rate account such violation.
8884-4
806
CASE NO. 16
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 20th day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
record by the use of the telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate H. M, Thornton
for eight hours at pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO. 17
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 21st day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
record by the use of the telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate L. L. Davis for
eight hours at the pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO. 18
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 22nd day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
record by the use of the .telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate L. L. Davis for
eight hours at the pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO. 19
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 23rd day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
record by the use of the telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate T. Manning for
eight hours at pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO. 20
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 27th day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
record by the use of the telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate H. M. Thornton
for eight hours at pro rata rate account such violation.
CASE NO. 21
1. Carrier violated Agreement between the parties hereto
when on the 28th day of May 1958 it caused, required or permitted
Extra Gang Foreman L. T. Lynch to transmit communication of
record by use of the telephone at Penelope, Texas.
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate L. L. Davis for
eight hours at the pro rata rate account such violation.
8884-5
807
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board finds:
That the dispute was certified to the Third Division of the Adjustment
Board ex parte by the complainant party; and
That hearing was waived and under date of July 1, 1959, the parties
jointly addressed a formal communication to the Secretary of the Third Division requesting withdrawal of this case, which request is hereby granted.
AWARD
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of THIRD DIVISION
ATTEST: A. Ivan Tummon
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 10th day of July, 1959.