BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
JOINT STATEMENT OF FACTS: On August 29, 1954 Mrs. Ruth Wait was an extra or unassigned employe holding seniority on the Springfield (Missouri) Terminal seniority district.
As the senior available qualified extra list employe Mrs. Wait was called in accordance with Rule 21 (c) to fill a short vacancy on Steno-Clerk Position No. 23 at the Springfield Freight Office. This position is assigned Monday through Friday, exclusive of holidays. She occupied this position during .the period August 30 through September 13, 1954, including Friday, September 3rd, and Tuesday, September 7th, which were the workdays immediately preceding and following the Labor Day Holiday, September 6th. She did not work the holiday.
POSITION OF EMPLOYES: There is in evidence an agreement between .the parties governing hours of service, rates of pay and working conditions of employes effective January 1, 1949, supplementary agreements of July 15, 1949, July 25, 1950, August S, 1950 and December 15, 1950 (Forty Hour Week Rules) and supplemental agreement of August 21, 1954, copies of which are on file with Your Honorable Board and by this reference thereto are made a part hereof. The particular rules in this dispute are:
There has been no dispute between the parties as to the meaning of the words "regularly assigned employes" as used in Article II, Section 1 (i) of the March 19, 1949 Conference Committee Agreement, nor has there been any dispute as to the work days of a work week of a regularly assigned employe under that rule.
When one considers together Article II, Section 1 (h) and 1 (i) of the March 19, 1949 Conference Committee Agreement and Article 11, Section 1 of the August 21, 1954 Conference Committee Agreement, the similarity of the wording in Article II, Section 1 (i) of the former agreement and Article H, Section 1 of the latter agreement is such that the employes specified in the holiday pay rule are the regularly assigned employes whose "work week" begins on the first day on which the assignment is bulletined to work.
The Forty Hour Work Week Agreement clearly distinguishes extra, unassigned or furloughed employes from regularly assigned employes and the same distinction is apparent in Article 11, Section 1, of the August 21, 1954 Agreement where the rule limits holiday pay to regularly assigned hourly and daily rated employes. There is no difference in the meaning of the words between two agreements.
The organization in its May 22, 1953 proposal sought a rule which would have given all employes seven holidays off with pay in each year, and having been unsuccessful in securing such a rule through the collective bargaining processes of the Railway Labor Act, they are here seeking to achieve that aim by Board Award in the guise of an interpreation of an agreement rule.
All data in support of Carrier's position have been presented to the employes or duly authorized representatives thereof and made a part of the particular question in dispute.
OPINION OF BOARD: The Carrier and the Organization in their Joint Submission agree that on August 29, 1954 Mrs. Ruth Wait was an extra or unassigned employe holding seniority on the Springfield (Missouri) Terminal seniority district. As senior available qualified extra list employe she was called in accordance with Rule 21 (c) to fill a short vacancy on Steno-Clerk Position No. 23 at the Springfield Freight Office. This position is assigned Monday through Friday, exclusive of holidays. She occupied this position during the period August 30 through September 13, 1954, including Friday, September 3rd, and Tuesday, September 7th, which were the work days immediately preceding and following the Labor Day Holiday, September 6th. She did not work the holiday.
The dispute arises over the failure of the Carrier to pay the Claimant the pro rata daily rate for the position, for Labor Day.
The Organization contends that Claimant should be paid and cites particularly Rules 13, 21 (c) and Article 11-Holidays of .the Agreement of August 21, 1954.
The Carrier takes the position that the claim rests primarily upon Article II, Section 1 of the August 21, 1954 Conference Committee Agreement.
Mrs. Wait occupied this position only during the period August 30 through September 13, so under Rule 13 it was considered a short vacancy and was filled without bulletining. She was filling said position because a regularly assigned employe was absent and could be relieved at any time by the regular employe returning to his assignment. In other words Mrs. Wait was only protecting extra work and could not be considered regularly assigned. 8901-9 9