NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS,
FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES
ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that:
CLAIM I
(A) The Carrier violated the terms of the currently effective
Agreement between the parties when it refused to cooperate with the
Employes in the assignment of vacation in 1956 of a Group 3 employe, C. D. Sanderson at Kansas City, Missouri, requiring him to
include a holiday as the first day of his vacation, thus depriving him
of one day's vacation to which he was entitled in the year 1956.
(B) C. D. Sanderson, now be allowed one day's pay at time
and one-half, in addition .to what he was paid for work performed on
Monday, November 24, 1956.
CLAIM II
(A) The Carrier violated the terms of the currently effective
Agreement between the parties when it failed and refused to cooperate with the Employes in granting the dates required for vacation during the year 1956, requiring Nathan Carlo, Cashier at
Blytheville, Arkansas, to include a holiday as the first day of his
vacation period, thus depriving him of one day's vacation to which
he was entitled during the year 1956.
(B) Nathan Carlo shall now be paid one day's pay at time and
one-half at the rate of his position account failure to grant one day's
vacation to which he was entitled.
CLAIM III
(A) The Carrier violated the terms of .the currently effective
Agreement between the parties when after permitting him to take
four day of his vacation, January 3, 4, 5, and 6, 1956, it subsequently
[1797
9070-2
180
charged Mr. Charles C. Baker with one day's vacation on January 2,
a holiday, without conference or agreement, and allowed him only
five additional days of vacation during the year 1956, thus requiring
him to work on one day for which he was entitled to vacation.
(B) Charles C. Baker shall now be allowed one day's pay at
the rate of his position at time and one-half, account not being
granted the number of days vacation to which he was entitled during
the year, 1956.
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving
the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon and upon the whole
record and all .the evidence, finds and holds:
That carrier and employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier
and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June
21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein;
That the dispute was certified to the Third Division of the Adjustment
Board ex parte by the complainant party; and
That hearing thereon has been held and concluded. Under date of October 20, 1959, the parties jointly advised the Secretary of the Third Division
of their desire to withdraw this case from further consideration by the Division, which request is hereby granted.
AWARD
Case dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of THIRD DIVISION
ATTEST: S. H. Schulty
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 18th day of November, 1959.