PARTIES TO DISPUTE:



SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY AND BROTHERHOOD OF
MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: The Statement of Claim as expressed by the Petitioner is as follows:



OPINION OF BOARD: The present claim concerns the interpretation of the controlling Union Shop Agreement. Specific procedural machinery has been set up by that Agreement to resolve all such questions. The prescribed procedure is final and binding upon the parties and, culminating as it does in a hearing before a neutral arbitrator, contains adequate checks and balances for the protection of the interests of all concerned, including those of the individual employes.


In the instant situation, the procedure established by the Agreement has been exhausted by the parties and a final and binding decision resolving the issues was handed down by the neutral arbitrator. That the Claimant, unlike most of the other employes in the dispute, elected not to appear at the hearing before the neutral arbitrator does not endow him with additional rights to prolong the dispute. It is incumbent upon the Claimant to abide by the prescribed procedure and the claim will be denied.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon and upon the whole record and all the evidence finds and holds:



9123-2 775

That the Carrier, Organization and Employe involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier, Organization and Employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and













Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 16th day of December, 1959.