NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN
THE NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
Eastern District (Except Boston and Albany Division)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee on the New
York Central Railroad Company (Buffalo and East) that:
(a) The Carrier violated the current Signal Inspector-Signal
Foreman Agreement, dated March 13, 1953 (particularly Rule 3),
when it failed to compensate Signal Inspector L. J, Hoone, with
assigned headquarters at Springfield, Mass.; Assistant Signal Inspector W. P. Bowman, with assigned headquarters at Albany, N. Y.;
and Relay Inspector W. D. Neale, with assigned headquarters at
Albany, N. Y., for service performed on December 22, 1956.
(b) The Carrier now be required to compensate the claimants
listed in part (a) at their respective overtime rate of pay for the
exact amount of hours they were required to perform service for
the Carrier on December 22, 1956.
(c) The Carrier further violated the current Signal InspectorSignal Foreman Agreement, dated March 13, 1953 (particularly
Rule 1), when it did not properly compensate Assistant Signal Inspector W. P. Bowman and Relay Inspector W. D. Neale at the Signal
Inspector rate of pay for work performed while assigned to work on
the Buffalo job.
(d) The Carrier now required to compensate the claimants listed in part (c) the difference in the rate of pay received and
the rate of pay of Signal Inspector for the exact amount of hours
they were required to perform service on the Buffalo job.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving
the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon and upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the carrier and employes involved in this dispute are respectively
carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
approved June 21, 1934;
[6787
9514-2
679
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein;
That the dispute was certified to the Third Division of the Adjustment
Board ex parte by the complainant party; and
That hearing was waived and under date of June 30, 1960, the complainant party addressed a formal communication to the Secretary of the
Third Division requesting withdrawal of this case, which request is hereby
granted.
AWARD
Case dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of THIRD DIVISION
ATTEST: S. H. Schulty
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of July, 1960.