STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Prior to January 19, 1956, the claimant was assigned to Yard Clerk Position No. 3070, at Bowden Yard, with Saturday and Sunday as rest days. Because of absence of incumbent of Bill Clerk Position No. 2243, due to illness, vacancy in that position was bulletined on January 10, 1956 with a stated probable duration of thirty days. The rest days on Position No. 2243 are Thursday and Friday. Instead of re-bulletining this position, in accordance with provisions of Rule 11 (a), modified by September 3, 1942 letter understanding, on February 25, 1956 in order that Clerk J. A. Flink could return to his assignment in Yard Clerk Position No. 3070, the Carrier failed to re-bulletin the vacancy until March 26, 1956, thereby forcing the claimant to remain on Position No. 2243 until April 5, and as a result he was required to suspend work on his assignment in Position No. 3070 on Thursday and Friday, March 8, 9, 15, 16 ,22, 23, 29 and 30, and was required to work Position No. 2243 on the rest day of his
"D"-letter from the General Superintendent to the General Chairman, dated September 3, 1942). Clerk Flink certainly was not such an employe. As was proper under the rules of the agreement, he filled the vacancy in Position No. 2243 beyond its initially estimated duration, it is true, but while doing so continued to enjoy the benefits which induced him to take it in the first place. It is uncontradictable, therefore, that he was not damaged in the slightest by the situation.
3. If, however, the claim otherwise had merit (and it does not), it would be valid for only a day's pay at pro rata rate of Position No. 3070 for March 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, 23, 29 and 30 under the principle thoroughly established in awards of the Third Division as fully explained in Award 7370 in which it was stated in the Opinion of Board:
Furthermore, under no consideration would any claim in behalf of Clerk Flink for March 17 and 18, 1956, be valid as on those dates he was absent from work and unavailable on account of personal illness.
For the reasons stated the claim is without merit in its entirety and should be denied.
The Florida East Coast Railway Company reserves the right to answer any further or other matters advanced by the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes, in connection with all issues in this case, whether oral or written, if and when it is furnished with the petition filed ex parte by the Brotherhood in this case, which it has not seen. All of the matters cited and relied upon by the Railway have been discussed with the Employes.
OPINION OF BOARD: The record does not sustain the violations alleged in the Statement of Claim. Consequently, the claim will be denied.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employe involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and