THIRD DIVISION

(Supplemental)




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES

THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN

RAILROAD COMPANY


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:




OPINION OF BOARD: The Claimant was accused of insubordination because he used obscene language in an argument with his foreman about the amount of overtime he was to receive. This argument occurred during the lunch hour on the Claimants free time.


The argument was not instituted by the Claimant, but he joined it after another Employe inquired about the amount of overtime they were to receive for unloading sheep. The regular tour of duty for those Employes was from 7:00 A. M. to 3:30 P. M., but they were notified by the foreman on the day before to report for work at 4:30 A. M. the following day. This was done, and they worked until 6:00 A. M.


During the course of the argument between the Claimant and foreman vile and obscene language was used. After the termination of the lunch hour, the crew returned to work. On the following Sunday, the Claimant was handed a letter of dismissal, charging insubordination.


While we do not condone the use of vulgar and obscene language, there is nothing in the record to sustain insubordination. There was no defiance of authority indicating that the Claimant wilfully refused to perform orders or directions of an official.



10538-2 389

The accusatory acts in the nature of a gripe, and were expressed during the free time of the Employe in the traditional forum of Employes during their lunch hour.


The Claimant's record of employment exhibits no past disciplinary action, he had been employed for a period of eight years by the Carrier.


It is true that there are past precedents of this Board denying claims arising from the use of obscene and vile language, but these cases involved the use of similar language in response to an order or direction by a superior official while on duty or was used in the presence of patrons and passengers of the Carrier.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21,1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and






    Claim sustained.


              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

              By Order of THIRD DIVISION


              ATTEST: S. H. Schulty

              Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of April 1962.