THIRD DIVISION

(Supplemental)




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
THE TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:




OPINION OF BOARD: This is a dispute between The Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes and The Texas and Pacific Railway Company.


The Claimant was a Section Laborer. The Claimant failed to report for work May 31, 1957. There is evidence that the Claimant took a trip and his car broke down. Claimant's friend testified that he notified Foreman Rich that Claimant would be unable to report for work. Rich testified that he was not notified. Claimant was dismissed from service. There was evidence that he was absent three times before without permission. He had been warned. Petitioner contends that the discipline is improper and without just cause.


The Carrier was justified in believing that the absence was premediated. Claimant did not tell the truth about former absences without permission. It is also noted that two of the former absences occurred immediately following a holiday as in this case. Based upon the facts before us, we believe that the penalty was not too severe.




FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:



10974-2 44

That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and













Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 13th day of December 1962.