STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-5241) that:
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant made application for employment with the Carrier on October 26, 1956. He was employed on the basis of the application and started work on October 29, 1956. One of the questions on the employment application was: "Have you ever been arrested?" Claimant answered: "No".
A routine check of employment applications disclosed that Claimant was arrested on April 4, 1954 and was charged with violating Section 887 sub. 4 of the Criminal Code of Procedure. He was released on $200.00 bail, and he was arraigned before Judge C. Partyka of the City Court of Buffalo, New York, on April 5, 1954. Claimant was represented by a lawyer. He pleaded guilty to the charge and on April 26, 1954 he received a suspended sentence and placed on probation for an indefinite period. The case was closed by the Probation Department on June 2, 1955.
Employes contend that Claimant did not believe he had been arrested, that he did not wilfully intend to falsify his application, and that it was improper to investigate Claimant's application more than five years after his employment.
Whatever the intent of the Claimant may have been there is no merit to the contention that he did not know he had been arrested. He posted bond, he appeared in court, he pleaded guilty, and he reported to a probation officer.
We have consistently held that an employe who falsifies his employment application, irrespective of the elapsed time between the date of the application and the date when the falsification was discovered, is subject to discharge. Awards 10090 (Mitchell), 5994 (Jasper), 5665 (Wyckoff), 4391 (Carter) and 4328 (Elkouri).
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and