THIRD DIVISION
(Supplemental)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: There are a number of offices. at various points within the shops at the Milwaukee Shops, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Clerical and supervisory forces occupy these offices. One such office is located at Davies Yard and is occupied by the District General Car Foreman, his clerical help, and his Assistant Foreman.
The janitor work in the District General Car Foreman's office at Davies Yard is being performed by Car Department Laborer Frank Klug, who is an employe not covered by the Clerks' Rules Agreement.
In 1949 a request was made by the Clerks' Organization for correction of the assignment of janitor work in the Car and Locomotive Departments to laborers not covered by the Clerks' Rules Agreement, and as a result, janitor and janitress positions were established in Seniority Districts 55 and 58 to perform this work. (See Employes' Exhibits "A", "B", "C" and "D".)
it is work which has never been performed by employes within the scope of the Clerks' Agreement and that there can be no basis for the claim and we respectfully request a denial award.
OPINION OF BOARD: The janitor work in the District General Car Foreman's office at Davies Yard is being performed by a Car Department Laborer who is an employe not covered by the Clerks' Rules Agreement. Claimant is a furloughed janitress having seniority under the Clerks' Agreement.
In Award No. 10732 (Ables) this Board has interpreted the same Rule of the same Agreement and the identical violation is involved-that of assigning janitor work to employes not covered by the Clerks' Agreement. Award No. 10732 is a binding interpretation of the Agreement and Rules and must be followed by us.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the .dispute involved herein; and