PARTIES TO DISPUTE:



THE NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN AND HARTFORD RAILROAD

COMPANY







EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: 1. May 7, 1961-auto. accident; May 8th, 1961 (husband booked me off sick).

2. Sept. 1961-Called Robert DeCesare, Head Clerk, Stamford Engine Off. told him doctor said I could return to work. Stated I had to go to Dr. Fischer, New Haven. He would let me know when. Called him several times, finally set date for October 16, 1961.


11774-16 738

All of the facts and arguments contained herein have been affirmatively presented to Employe's representatives.


    (Exhibits not reproduced.)


OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant, a stenographer in Carrier's employ, was injured in an automobile accident while off duty on May 7, 1961. On applying for return to work, Claimant was examined by Carrier's doctor on October 16, 1961, and again on January 23, 1962, who reported she was "not qualified to work where sitting is required."


Under date of February 20, 1962, the General Chairman wrote Carrier requesting that Claimant be examined by a neutral doctor under the procedure set forth in Rule 9 of the agreement between the parties, and furnished Carrier with copies of reports from Claimant's personal physician dated January 5 and 25, 1962, attesting that Claimant could return to work. Carrier agreed and the two doctors selected a neutral doctor who examined Claimant on March 28, 1962. In his report dated April 9, which Carrier received on Friday, April 13, 1962, the neutral doctor expressed the opinion that, while Claimant's history showed that she probably had a coceydynia and a cervicodorsal strain, she should be able to return to her regular work. Carrier restored Claimant to service on Monday, April 16, 1962.


The claim herein is for wage loss covering but a portion of the time Claimant was held out of service on recommendation of Carrier's doctor, namely, from January 23 to April 16, 1962. However, the record does not show that there was any unreasonable delay, attributable to the Carrier or otherwise, after the General Chairman requested that Claimant be examined by a netural doctor under Rule 9. Consequently, we must deny the claim.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


    That the parties waived oral hearing:


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and


    That the agreement was not violated.


                  AWARD


    Claim denied.


              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of THIRD DIVISION


              ATTEST: S. H. Schulty

              Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 9th day of October 1963.