THIRD DIVISION

(Supplemental)




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:






STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee on the New York Central Railroad-Western District, that:

















11965-2 432
Name Date Time Claimed
C. E. Smothers March 14, 1957 4 hours
D. J. Casadonte April 5, 1957 3 hours






















EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The named claimants received the following Yellow Bulletin Notice on January 9, 1957, issued by the Super-
intendent of the Carrier at Chicago, Illinois:


"ALL CONDUCTORS N0. NYC-250 MC-138

ALL TRAINMEN

ALL ENGINEMEN

ALL YARDMEN

ALL TELEGRAPHERS AND DISPATCHERS

ALL AGENTS

New `Rules of the Operating Department' dated October 28, 1956, for the purpose of information only, will be distributed to all em-
11965-20 450

Rules" will be compensated therefor. The claim for completing a questionnaire on the rules on claimants' own time was denied, the Board stating that the claim was not supported by the rule.


Similarly, the Third Division has held that claims for compensation for attending class or examination on operating rules must be denied in the absence of a specific rule covering the matter; Awards 7577, 7631.


In Third Division Award No. 6906 the applicable agreement contained a provision for compensation for examinations attended on rest days and the claim was for compensation for examinations attended on off duty hours. The claim was sustained only to the extent of the actual wording of the agreement, Referee A. L. Coffey stating that the Board shall not be used by the parties to gain by interpretation what was not yet settled by the parties in negotiation.


Therefore, under the principles of the First and Third Divisions, National Railroad Adjustment Board, the claims in this dispute are not valid since they are not supported by the wording of the applicable agreement.












All evidence and data set forth herein have been considered by the parties in conference.


OPINION OF BOARD: The issue is whether Carrier is obligated to pay Claimants for attending a class or examination in connection with operating rules, where Carrier within the same calendar year had previously required Claimants to fill out the answers to 906 printed questions. Article 19, Section 3 of the effective Agreement provides in part:



11965-21 451







The prior requirement of completing 906 answers to printed questions was an examination within the meaning of Article 19, Section 3, and such prior requirement exhausted the exception of Article 19, Section 3. It follows that Claimants are due compensation for the subsequent and second period, a class of instruction or examination.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:




That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and






    Claim sustained.


              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of THIRD DIVISION


              ATTEST: S. H. Schulty

              Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 13th day of December 1963.