THIRD DIVISION

(Supplemental)




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:




EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: On November 18, 1957, and on date subsequent thereto, the work of cutting fire lanes on the Carrier's rightof-way between Dundee, Virginia and Winesap, Virginia was assigned to and performed by outside forces.


Similarly, on January 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, 1958, and on dates subsequent thereto, the work of cutting fire lanes on the right-of-way between Winesap, Virginia and Alexandria, Virginia was assigned to and performed by outside forces.


The cutting of these fire lanes by outside forces, who hold no seniority rights under the provisions of this Agreement, was accomplished through the operation and use of a bulldozer.


The work was of the character that has heretofore been usually and traditionally performed by the Carrier's Maintenance of Way Department employes, either by the use of bulldozers or by the use of shovels.


The claimant, who has established and holds seniority as a Tractor Operator, was available, fully qualified and could have efficiently and expediently performed the work assigned to contract.



12011-22 168



Monopolistic rights not having been conferred upon tractor (bulldozer) operators by any language contained in the Agreement in evidence and tractor (bulldozer) operators not heretofore having been utilized to perform the work exclusively under an established practice, in fact, the practice being to the contrary, the Board cannot do other than make a denial award.


All evidence submitted in support of Carrier's position is known to employe representatives.


Carrier, not having seen the Brotherhood's submission, reserves the right after doing so to make response thereto and submit any other evidence necessary for the protection of its interests.




OPINION OF BOARD: It appears from the record that various exhibits in Ex Parte Submissions by both Employes and Carrier were not exhibited to the adverse party and made a part of the dispute during handling of the claim on the property.


The paucity of the evidence introduced and exchanged by the parties during handling of the claim on the property requires dismissal of the claim. Please see Circular No. I of the Board.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and












Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of December 1963.