NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
(Supplemental)
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that,
1. W. T. Richards has clerical seniority on the Atlanta Division of the Southern Railway Company dating from March 27, 1942.
2. Mr. Richards has occupied various clerical positions with the Carrier. On July 24, 1953, he was assigned to the position of Rate Clerk in the Atlanta Agency, under the supervision of Mr. M. W. Taylor, Freight Agent. He worked that position until July 16, 1958, at which time he displaced J. 0. Wrinkle, Chief Rate and Bill Clerk at the Atlanta Agency. The displacement was caused by a change in the rest days of the Rate Clerk position occupied by Mr. Richards.
3. The Rate Clerk position occupied by the Claimant prior to July 16, 1958, primarily covers the rating of carload shipments. The Chief Rate and Bill Clerk position primarily covers the rating of Less than Carload shipments.
4. Prior to his displacement by Mr. Richards, Mr. J, O. Wrinkle had occupied the Chief Rate and Bill Clerk position for a number of years.
Carrier respectfully submits that the evidence adduced at the hearing incontrovertibly proves that Mr. Richards' service was entirely unsatisfactory, and his disqualification was fully warranted.
There was no logical or justifiable reason why carrier should sacrifice a thoroughly efficient and economical operation in its Rate and Bill Department in order to permit claimant to remain on the chief rate and bill clerk position.
The evidence of record does not support petitioner's claim that the agreement was violated or that claimant should be restored to the position of chief rate and bill clerk. To the contrary, carrier has shown that claimant is definitely not qualified to fill such position. For the reasons set forth herein, the claim should be denied in its entirety, and carrier respectfully requests that the Board so decide.
All pertinent facts and data used by the carrier in this case have been made known to the employe representatives.
OPINION OF BOARD: Carrier's disqualification of Claimant from the position of Chief Rate and Bill Clerk was not arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable. Claimant had the burden of proving he was qualified for the position. This he did not do.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934; 12013-20 231