THIRD DIVISION

(Supplemental)




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:



CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC

RAILROAD COMPANY


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of The Order of Railroad Telegraphers on the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad, that:



(1) (2) (3) (4)
Date Station Servicing
Closed Closed Station Claimant
12/ 9/58 Menlo, Iowa Stuart, Iowa J. W. Dailey
12/24/58 Casey, Iowa Adair, Iowa P. B. Brown
12/24/58 Desoto, Iowa Van Meter, Iowa F. L. Furlong
12/24/58 Dexter, Iowa Stuart, Iowa J. W. Dailey
12/24/58 Shelby, Iowa Avoca, Iowa N. S. Wilson
12/24/58 Walnut, Iowa Avoca, Iowa N. S. Wilson
12/ 9/58 Corydon, Iowa Allerton, Iowa R. D. Rector
12/ 9/58 Fernald, Iowa Nevada, Iowa M. A. Sandmeier
12/ 9/58 Goldfield, Iowa Holmes, Iowa F. B. Champlin
12/ 9/58 Osgood, Iowa Graettinger, Iowa A. J. Springer
12/ 9/58 Rodman, Iowa West Bend, Iowa F. Blank
12/ 9/58 West Chester, Iowa Washington, Iowa J. B. Vaira
12/24/58 Bonaparte, Iowa Keosauqua, Iowa B. B. Baker
12/24/58 Elkhart, Iowa Cambridge, Iowa T. H. Gill


12696--2 212
(1) (2) (3)
Date Station Servicing
Closed Closed Station Claimant
12/24/58 Galt, Iowa Clarion, Iowa R. J. Patton
12/24/58 Goodell, Iowa Klemme, Iowa E. D. Myers
12/24/58 Garden City, Iowa McCallsburg, Iowa J. D. Sandmeier
12/24/58 Hardy, Iowa Livermore, Iowa E. P. Corbett
12/24/58 Harris, Iowa Lake Park, Iowa D. F. Carlson
12/24/58 Hayfield, Iowa Crystal Lake, Iowa R. E. Reasoner
12/24(58 Larchwood, Iowa Lester, Iowa F. E. Dwyer
12/24158 Maple Hill, Iowa Armstrong, Iowa E. J. Daries
12/24/58 Otley, Iowa Monroe, Iowa W. C. Argenbright
12/24/58 Ottosen, Iowa Bode, Iowa L. L. Siefken
12724/58 Rossie, Iowa Royal, Iowa P. A. Lien
12/24/58 Somers-Sliver, Iowa Manson, Iowa J. B. Campbell
12/ 9/58 Nichols, Iowa West Liberty, Iowa H. C. Jost
12/ 9/58 Hazleton, Iowa Oelwein, Iowa C. W. Henry
12/ 9/58 Ladora, Iowa Marengo, Iowa E. C. Berry
12/ 9/58 Letts, Iowa Columbus Jet., Iowa W. O. Calloway
12/24/58 Atallisa, Iowa Wilton Jet., Iowa L. J. Hartgrave
12/24/58 Clermont, Iowa Elgin, Iowa C. W. Hendrickson
12/24/58 Kinross, Iowa Wellman, Iowa H. R. McGuire
12/24/58 Malcom, Iowa Grinnell, Iowa S. Handley
12(24/58 Mitchellville, Iowa Colfax, Iowa G. K. Bell
12/24/58 Rowley, Iowa Walker, Iowa B. D. Nicholas
12/24/58 Stockton, Iowa Durant, Iowa E. E. McEacharn



EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Agreements between the parties are available to your Board and by this reference are made a part hereof.


On the dates listed in Column 1 of paragraph 1 of the Statement of Claim, this Carrier closed the stations listed in Column 2, transferred and assigned the work, duties and responsibilities of the closed stations to the agent-telegrapher at the stations listed in Column 3.


The gross revenue of the stations closed is shown in ORT Exhibits Nos. 1, 2 and 3. The range is from $14,436.00 to $52,304.00 on the Rock Island Division; $6,945.00 to $79,741.00 on the Des Moines Division; $8,884.00 to $71,207.00

12696 -17 00










OPINION OF BOARD: The Carrier, acting under authorization of the Iowa State Commerce Commission, closed the stations listed in the employes ex parts submission and required the servicing stations listed therein to perform the work of the closed stations.


This claim is brought in behalf of the agent-telegraphers at the servicing stations and concerns an interpretation of Rule 7 of the Agreement, which reads as follows:






At the risk of over-simplifying the respective positions of the Claimants and the Carrier, the Board understands the controversy to be as follows: The employes alleged that when the total work load of the closed stations was assigned, lump sum, to the respective servicing stations, it created a less favorable condition of employment than the agent-telegraphers had bargained for under the agreement. The Carrier maintains that the agent-telegrapher bargained for eight hours of work at a stipulated rate of pay and that such additional work, admittedly performed within the eight hour working day, does not create a less favorable condition of employment, but is actually a proper assignment of duties under the agreement.


The record indicates that the servicing agent is able to complete his previously assigned work and the additional duties, well within the given eight hour period.


Although the servicing agents are admittedly performing additional work over and above that which they were performing prior to the stations being

12696-13 228

closed, it is the opinion of the Board, that such work does not, as a question of fact, constitute a less favorable condition of employment or establish a less favorable rate of pay, under our interpretation of Rule 7 of the agreement.

FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:



That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and











Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of June 1964.