NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
(Supplemental)
Don Hamilton, Referee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS
CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC
RAILROAD COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of The
Order of Railroad Telegraphers on the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad, that:
1. Carrier violated the Agreement between the parties when it
established a less favorable condition of employment for employes
occupying positions of agent-telegrapher at the stations listed in
Column 3, below, by requiring them to perform the work of the
stations listed in Column 2, below, in addition to their own work:
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Date Station
Servicing
Closed Closed Station Claimant
12/ 9/58 Menlo, Iowa Stuart, Iowa J. W. Dailey
12/24/58 Casey, Iowa Adair, Iowa P. B. Brown
12/24/58 Desoto, Iowa Van Meter, Iowa F. L. Furlong
12/24/58 Dexter, Iowa Stuart, Iowa J. W. Dailey
12/24/58 Shelby, Iowa Avoca, Iowa N. S. Wilson
12/24/58 Walnut, Iowa Avoca, Iowa N. S. Wilson
12/ 9/58 Corydon, Iowa Allerton, Iowa R. D. Rector
12/ 9/58 Fernald, Iowa Nevada, Iowa M. A. Sandmeier
12/ 9/58 Goldfield, Iowa Holmes, Iowa F. B. Champlin
12/ 9/58 Osgood, Iowa Graettinger, Iowa A. J. Springer
12/ 9/58 Rodman, Iowa West Bend, Iowa F. Blank
12/ 9/58 West Chester, Iowa Washington, Iowa J. B. Vaira
12/24/58 Bonaparte, Iowa Keosauqua, Iowa B. B. Baker
12/24/58 Elkhart, Iowa Cambridge, Iowa T. H. Gill
12117
12696--2
212
(1) (2) (3)
Date Station Servicing
Closed Closed Station Claimant
12/24/58 Galt, Iowa Clarion, Iowa R. J. Patton
12/24/58 Goodell, Iowa
Klemme, Iowa
E. D. Myers
12/24/58 Garden City, Iowa McCallsburg, Iowa J. D. Sandmeier
12/24/58 Hardy, Iowa Livermore, Iowa E. P. Corbett
12/24/58 Harris, Iowa Lake Park, Iowa D. F. Carlson
12/24/58 Hayfield, Iowa Crystal Lake, Iowa R. E. Reasoner
12/24(58 Larchwood, Iowa Lester, Iowa F. E. Dwyer
12/24158 Maple Hill, Iowa Armstrong, Iowa E. J. Daries
12/24/58 Otley, Iowa Monroe, Iowa W. C. Argenbright
12/24/58 Ottosen, Iowa Bode, Iowa L. L. Siefken
12724/58 Rossie, Iowa Royal, Iowa P. A. Lien
12/24/58 Somers-Sliver, Iowa Manson, Iowa J. B. Campbell
12/ 9/58 Nichols, Iowa West Liberty, Iowa H. C. Jost
12/ 9/58 Hazleton, Iowa Oelwein, Iowa C. W. Henry
12/ 9/58 Ladora, Iowa Marengo, Iowa E. C. Berry
12/ 9/58 Letts, Iowa Columbus Jet., Iowa W. O. Calloway
12/24/58 Atallisa, Iowa Wilton Jet., Iowa L. J. Hartgrave
12/24/58 Clermont, Iowa Elgin, Iowa C. W. Hendrickson
12/24/58 Kinross, Iowa Wellman, Iowa H. R. McGuire
12/24/58 Malcom, Iowa Grinnell, Iowa S. Handley
12(24/58 Mitchellville, Iowa Colfax, Iowa G. K. Bell
12/24/58 Rowley, Iowa Walker, Iowa B. D. Nicholas
12/24/58 Stockton, Iowa Durant, Iowa E. E. McEacharn
2. Carrier shall be required to compensate the claimants named
in Column 4, or their reliefs or successors, in the amount of a day's
pay of eight (8) hours, at the rate of the closed station they have
been forced to "service" beginning on the date listed in Column 1,
and continuing thereafter on a day-to-day basis until the violations
are corrected.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Agreements between the
parties are available to your Board and by this reference are made a part
hereof.
On the dates listed in Column 1 of paragraph 1 of the Statement of
Claim, this Carrier closed the stations listed in Column 2, transferred and
assigned the work, duties and responsibilities of the closed stations to the
agent-telegrapher at the stations listed in Column 3.
The gross revenue of the stations closed is shown in ORT Exhibits Nos. 1,
2 and 3. The range is from $14,436.00 to $52,304.00 on the Rock Island Division; $6,945.00 to $79,741.00 on the Des Moines Division; $8,884.00 to $71,207.00
12696 -17
00
27
In summary, the Carrier submits:
1. The Carrier fully
complied with ORDER A-5788 of the Iowa
Commerce Commission.
2. The Carrier fully
complied with its contract with The Order
of Railroad Telegraphers.
3. The exception the employes take to Carrier's action is to
complain about more work being added to the agent-telegrapher at the so-called servicing station. The Carrier asserts
positively that the
telegrapher's work
which was formerly
performed at the closed station is now being performed by
employes represented
by the craft doing the complaining.
The Carrier is simply asking for a day's work for a day's pay.
4. Because neither the facts in the case nor the applicable
agreement support the employes' allegation that the Carrier ". . . established a less favorable condition of employment . . ", we respectfully request your Board so hold by
issuing a denial award.
(Exhibits not reproduced.)
OPINION OF BOARD: The Carrier, acting under authorization of the
Iowa State Commerce Commission, closed the stations listed in the employes
ex parts submission and required the servicing stations listed therein to perform the work of the closed stations.
This claim is brought in behalf of the agent-telegraphers at the servicing
stations and concerns an interpretation of Rule 7 of the Agreement, which
reads as follows:
"RULE 7-RATES OF PAY TO BE MAINTAINED
The entering of employes into existing positions or the changing
of their classification or work shall not operate to establish a less
favorable rate of pay or condition of employment than is herein
established."
At the risk of over-simplifying
the respective
positions of the Claimants
and the Carrier, the Board understands the controversy to be as follows:
The
employes alleged
that when the total work load of the closed stations was
assigned, lump sum, to
the respective servicing
stations, it created a less
favorable condition of
employment than
the agent-telegraphers had bargained
for under the agreement. The Carrier maintains that the agent-telegrapher
bargained for eight hours of work at a stipulated rate of pay and that such
additional work, admittedly performed within the eight hour working day,
does not
create a
less favorable condition of employment, but is actually a
proper assignment of duties under the
agreement.
The record indicates that the servicing agent is able to complete his
previously assigned work and the additional duties, well within the given
eight hour
period.
Although the servicing agents are admittedly performing additional work
over and above that
which they
were performing prior to the stations being
12696-13
228
closed, it is the opinion of the Board, that such work does not, as a question
of fact, constitute a less favorable condition of employment or establish a
less favorable rate of pay, under our interpretation of Rule 7 of the agreement.
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the
whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
AWARD
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of THIRD DIVISION
ATTEST: S. H. Schulty
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of June 1964.