PARTIES TO DISPUTE:



STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of The Order of Railroad Telegraphers on the Southern Railway, that:






EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: On or about July 3, 1960, the Carrier put into effect a program on a system-wide basis of removing a large portion of communication work namely, transmitting and receiving messages and reports of record, which had from time immemorial been performed by


12703-17 445

OPINION OF BOARD: The claim alleges a violation, because, at about 12:30 P. M. on July 18, 1960, a Clerk in the Train Dispatchers' office at Knoxville, Tenn., telephoned to a Clerk-Telegrapher in John Sevier Yard in the Knoxville area, instructions about movement that evening of a car of storage mail from Knoxville to Johnson City, Tennessee.


The Petitioner alleges that there was an improper transfer of this work from telegrapher employes and that this is part of a general program initiated about July 1960, to shift telegraphers' work to other personnel, which had from "time immemorial" been performed by telegrapher employes.


Twenty-five exhibits are included by the Petitioner purporting to show instructions by Carrier for transfer of said work on the Southern system. We have examined these exhibits in previous claims and have concluded that they did not by themselves show the violations claimed. The same is true of the claim before us.


The parties are here in conflict on the basic question under the general Scope Rule contained in the governing Agreement-that is, whether the work which is claimed has been customarily and traditionally the exclusive assignment of Claimants. The Petitioner claims it has. The Carrier denies this, saying that communications of the kind here involved have always been telephoned by a clerk in the dispatchers' office to a clerk-telegrapher in John Sevier Yard as far back as 1930.


The contentions are therefore in conflict concerning the history of practices and we are without proof to enable us to resolve this conflict in facts.




FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and






    Claim dismissed.


              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of THIRD DIVISION


              ATTEST: S. H. Schulty

              Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 2nd day of July 1964.