THIRD DIVISION
(Supplemental)
ity to Howard), was filling the temporary vacancy and had been on such vacancy for more than seven (7) days; (5) Howard, therefore, had the right not only under the provisions of Article 24 (c), but also under the provisions of the interpretation to Article 25, to displace this junior extra employe from that temporary vacancy.
OPINION OF BOARD: W. D. Howard, holding more seniority than E. F_ Mitchell on the seniority roster of agents and operators on the Western District, had been promoted to the position of Trainmaster and subsequently relinquished that position and, as provided in the Agreement, he was placed on the extra list. At the time Howard was demoted, Mitchell, an employe from the extra list, had been working on a temporary vacancy, for more than 7 days. Howard was allowed to displace Mitchell on that assignment.
Carrier argues that Howard, upon promotion, was automatically on leave of absence, and therefore, under the terms of Article 24 (c), had the right to replace Mitchell as a junior extra employe filling a temporary vacancy. Organization argues that Howard was not on leave of absence automatically or otherwise when he was promoted to Trainmaster, and met none of the other conditions precedent required by Article 24 (c), entitling him to displace Mitchell.
The case turns on the question of whether or not Howard was returning from a leave of absence. There is nothing in the Agreement which grants an automatic leave of absence to employes on promotion; Carrier submitted no. evidence beyond Carrier's bare assertion that such is the intention of any Rule in the Agreement. We find, therefore, that Howard was not returning from a leave of absence. Consequently, Carrier violated the Agreement when it permitted Howard to displace Mitchell.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and