NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
(Supplemental)
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY
(Pacific Lines)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen on the Southern Pacific Company that:
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Claimant C. 0. McLaury had been assigned to a permanent Leading Signalman position on Gang No. 9 by Signal Department Assignment & Vacancy Notice No. 1074 of October 20, 1958. A copy of that notice has been attached hereto and identified as Brotherhood's Exhibit No. 1. Gang No. 9 is a "town" gang, with no outfit cars or other living quarters furnished by the Carrier. The headquarters of the gang is Burbank, California, and a majority of the gang employes live in or near Burbank.
On Saturday, October 17, 1959, Gang No. 9 was used to repair a damaged flasher at Rose Road, Oxnard, California. Signal Foreman D. D. Wilson and six Signalmen worked from 7:30 A. M. until 5:30 P. M. The
names and signalman seniority dates of the claimant and these six Signalmen are hereby listed for ready reference:
claimant's place was used from necessity because of claimant's own failure to comply with instructions and advise his foreman as to his address and telephone number.
Clearly, any employe desiring to be called during other than his assigned hours is obligated, under the agreement, to cooperate to the extent of giving his supervisors his address and telephone number, thereby making it possible for them to call him.
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant, as a senior member of his signal gang, was entitled to preference for any overtime work. On October 17, 1959, his gang was used to repair a damaged flasher, but he was not called. Carrier states that Claimant was not called because he could not be reached. In our opinion, Claimant was not available. The facts are:
Foreman Wilson, in charge of the gang, did not have Claimant's address or telephone number. Although Claimant had been asked to furnish them, he failed to do so. Claimant answered that he was not obliged to have a telephone, and that he had furnished the address. The address which Claimant had furnished was not his current one. He had recently moved, but had not furnished the new address. It was his obligation to keep the information as to his home address current.
Claimant said he had heard that one of the gang had offered to pick him up. Foreman Wilson flatly denied this. Information is based on hearsay. He did not submit a statement from any member of the gang saying that such an offer had been made.
Claimant's right to overtime work is not absolute. He has an obligation to make himself available. Carrier should not have the burden to seek him out and find him. Overtime work for such gangs is often emergency work, where time is of the essence.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds: 13173-13 lo(9